Relative importance of safety against natural disasters for residential selection: a case study at Osaka prefecture, Japan

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
T. Takabatake, Nanami Hasegawa, Suguru Nishigaki
{"title":"Relative importance of safety against natural disasters for residential selection: a case study at Osaka prefecture, Japan","authors":"T. Takabatake, Nanami Hasegawa, Suguru Nishigaki","doi":"10.1108/ijdrbe-08-2022-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to clarify the following research questions: to what extent do people consider natural disaster risks as important for residential selection? what personal demographics and attitudes toward natural disaster risks are associated with the relative importance of natural disasters for residential selection? and to what extent do the associated personal attributes influence the relative importance of natural disasters for residential selection?\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn internet-based survey was performed to collect 2,000 responses from residents of Osaka Prefecture, Japan, to gauge people’s relative importance of safety against natural disasters regarding residential preference. The obtained results were analysed using two types of statistical analysis, specifically chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression analyses.\n\n\nFindings\nIt was found that 37.3% of the respondents in Osaka Prefecture, Japan, considered the “safety against natural disasters” relatively important when selecting a residential location. The statistical analysis also demonstrated that those having a relatively higher level of disaster awareness and preparedness were 1.41 times more likely to prefer to live in a place that is safer from natural disasters. Thus, it was suggested that disaster education aimed at raising the level of people’s disaster awareness could be effective to increase the number of people who choose to live in a safer place from natural disasters.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLiving in an area that is safer from natural disasters can effectively minimize human and property damage. Recently, several measures have been taken in Japan to guide people to live in a safer place. The clarification of the extent to which people consider natural disaster risks as important for residential selection and the understanding of the categories of the people who are likely to do so is important to develop more effective natural disaster measures; however, there has been less attention on such investigation. Therefore, this study conducted an internet-based survey and examined it.\n","PeriodicalId":45983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-08-2022-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to clarify the following research questions: to what extent do people consider natural disaster risks as important for residential selection? what personal demographics and attitudes toward natural disaster risks are associated with the relative importance of natural disasters for residential selection? and to what extent do the associated personal attributes influence the relative importance of natural disasters for residential selection? Design/methodology/approach An internet-based survey was performed to collect 2,000 responses from residents of Osaka Prefecture, Japan, to gauge people’s relative importance of safety against natural disasters regarding residential preference. The obtained results were analysed using two types of statistical analysis, specifically chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Findings It was found that 37.3% of the respondents in Osaka Prefecture, Japan, considered the “safety against natural disasters” relatively important when selecting a residential location. The statistical analysis also demonstrated that those having a relatively higher level of disaster awareness and preparedness were 1.41 times more likely to prefer to live in a place that is safer from natural disasters. Thus, it was suggested that disaster education aimed at raising the level of people’s disaster awareness could be effective to increase the number of people who choose to live in a safer place from natural disasters. Originality/value Living in an area that is safer from natural disasters can effectively minimize human and property damage. Recently, several measures have been taken in Japan to guide people to live in a safer place. The clarification of the extent to which people consider natural disaster risks as important for residential selection and the understanding of the categories of the people who are likely to do so is important to develop more effective natural disaster measures; however, there has been less attention on such investigation. Therefore, this study conducted an internet-based survey and examined it.
自然灾害安全对住宅选择的相对重要性——以日本大阪府为例
本研究旨在澄清以下研究问题:人们在多大程度上认为自然灾害风险是住宅选择的重要因素?什么个人人口统计和对自然灾害风险的态度与自然灾害对住宅选择的相对重要性有关?相关的个人属性在多大程度上影响了自然灾害对住宅选择的相对重要性?设计/方法/方法一项基于互联网的调查收集了2000名日本大阪府居民的回复,以衡量人们对居住偏好的相对重要性。对所得结果进行两种统计分析,即卡方检验和多变量logistic回归分析。调查结果发现,在日本大阪府,37.3%的受访者在选择居住地点时认为“抵御自然灾害的安全性”相对重要。统计分析还表明,那些灾害意识和准备程度相对较高的人,更愿意生活在远离自然灾害的地方的可能性是普通人的1.41倍。因此,有人建议,旨在提高人们灾害意识水平的灾害教育可以有效地增加选择在远离自然灾害的更安全的地方生活的人数。原创性/价值生活在远离自然灾害的安全地区可以有效地减少人员和财产损失。最近,日本采取了一些措施来引导人们生活在一个更安全的地方。澄清人们在多大程度上认为自然灾害风险对住宅选择至关重要,并了解可能这样做的人群类别,对于制定更有效的自然灾害措施至关重要;然而,对此类调查的关注较少。因此,本研究进行了一项基于互联网的调查并进行了检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信