Technology, Ethics, and the Pandemic: Responses from Key Accounting Actors

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
E. Boulianne, Annie Lecompte, Mélissa Fortin
{"title":"Technology, Ethics, and the Pandemic: Responses from Key Accounting Actors","authors":"E. Boulianne, Annie Lecompte, Mélissa Fortin","doi":"10.2308/api-2022-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A pandemic is an exceptional context involving radical disruptions for organizations and society. Ethical considerations evolve among individuals and organizations, and the way technology is used is an important factor in this evolution. We explore how key actors in the accounting space—namely, the Big 4 firms, the professional accounting associations, and the audit regulators—responded to the conjunction of the pandemic, ethics, and technology. We contextualize our documentation analysis referring to the ETHOs framework, which integrates ethics and technology. Findings suggest that ethics and technology are significant for the professional accounting associations and the audit regulators during the pandemic. In contrast, the Big 4 appear to overlook this importance, focusing instead on gains to be obtained from technology, applying a commercial logic above a professional logic. Our study underscores the importance of considering ethics in the future design and utilization of technology to maintain trust in the accounting profession.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cites in the text.","PeriodicalId":38883,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and the Public Interest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and the Public Interest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/api-2022-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A pandemic is an exceptional context involving radical disruptions for organizations and society. Ethical considerations evolve among individuals and organizations, and the way technology is used is an important factor in this evolution. We explore how key actors in the accounting space—namely, the Big 4 firms, the professional accounting associations, and the audit regulators—responded to the conjunction of the pandemic, ethics, and technology. We contextualize our documentation analysis referring to the ETHOs framework, which integrates ethics and technology. Findings suggest that ethics and technology are significant for the professional accounting associations and the audit regulators during the pandemic. In contrast, the Big 4 appear to overlook this importance, focusing instead on gains to be obtained from technology, applying a commercial logic above a professional logic. Our study underscores the importance of considering ethics in the future design and utilization of technology to maintain trust in the accounting profession. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cites in the text.
技术、伦理和流行病:主要会计行为者的回应
大流行病是一种特殊情况,涉及对组织和社会的彻底破坏。伦理考虑在个人和组织中不断演变,技术的使用方式是这种演变的一个重要因素。我们探讨了会计领域的关键参与者——即四大会计师事务所、专业会计协会和审计监管机构——如何应对疫情、道德和技术的结合。我们参考ETHO框架对我们的文档分析进行了背景分析,该框架整合了道德和技术。调查结果表明,在疫情期间,道德和技术对专业会计协会和审计监管机构具有重要意义。相比之下,四巨头似乎忽视了这一重要性,转而关注从技术中获得的收益,将商业逻辑应用于专业逻辑之上。我们的研究强调了在未来设计和利用技术以保持对会计行业的信任时考虑道德的重要性。数据可用性:数据可从文本中引用的公共来源获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting and the Public Interest
Accounting and the Public Interest Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信