Public health response to COVID-19 pandemic and drivers of mistrust in Ghana

IF 0.9 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
E. Bisung, Achore Meshack, Ebenezer Dassah, Vincent Z. Kuuire
{"title":"Public health response to COVID-19 pandemic and drivers of mistrust in Ghana","authors":"E. Bisung, Achore Meshack, Ebenezer Dassah, Vincent Z. Kuuire","doi":"10.1080/19376812.2021.2007411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent studies suggest that trust in government and public health experts is vital for acceptance of public health recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is increasingly clear that mistrust in public health recommendation affects efforts to slowdown the spread of COVID-19 in many countries. The objective of this study is to identify perceived drivers of mistrust in public health responses to COVID-19 in Ghana, using concept mapping with a range of local stakeholders (n = 21). The study was conducted between July and August 2020. Fifty-two items describing factors that influence mistrust in COVID-19 response were identified across eight themes. Out of eight clusters that emerged, participants rated weak health system, distrust in politicians and state institutions, and politicization of response measures as the most important and prevalent drivers of mistrust . The results show that the old narrative of cultural beliefs and illiteracy is not sufficient for understanding mistrust in public health programs during epidemics in SSA, at least in the case of COVID-19 in Ghana. This study demonstrates the need for global health practitioners to pay attention to structural forces and political relations in order to paint a fuller picture of mistrust during epidemics and pandemics.","PeriodicalId":44819,"journal":{"name":"African Geographical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Geographical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2021.2007411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent studies suggest that trust in government and public health experts is vital for acceptance of public health recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is increasingly clear that mistrust in public health recommendation affects efforts to slowdown the spread of COVID-19 in many countries. The objective of this study is to identify perceived drivers of mistrust in public health responses to COVID-19 in Ghana, using concept mapping with a range of local stakeholders (n = 21). The study was conducted between July and August 2020. Fifty-two items describing factors that influence mistrust in COVID-19 response were identified across eight themes. Out of eight clusters that emerged, participants rated weak health system, distrust in politicians and state institutions, and politicization of response measures as the most important and prevalent drivers of mistrust . The results show that the old narrative of cultural beliefs and illiteracy is not sufficient for understanding mistrust in public health programs during epidemics in SSA, at least in the case of COVID-19 in Ghana. This study demonstrates the need for global health practitioners to pay attention to structural forces and political relations in order to paint a fuller picture of mistrust during epidemics and pandemics.
加纳应对COVID-19大流行的公共卫生措施和不信任的驱动因素
摘要最近的研究表明,在新冠肺炎大流行期间,信任政府和公共卫生专家对于接受公共卫生建议至关重要。越来越明显的是,对公共卫生建议的不信任影响了许多国家减缓新冠肺炎传播的努力。本研究的目的是通过与一系列当地利益相关者(n=21)的概念映射,确定加纳公共卫生应对新冠肺炎的不信任因素。该研究于2020年7月至8月进行。在八个主题中确定了52个项目,描述了影响新冠肺炎应对中不信任的因素。在出现的八个集群中,参与者认为薄弱的卫生系统、对政客和国家机构的不信任以及应对措施的政治化是不信任的最重要和最普遍的驱动因素。结果表明,文化信仰和文盲的旧叙事不足以理解SSA流行病期间对公共卫生计划的不信任,至少在加纳的新冠肺炎情况下是这样。这项研究表明,全球卫生从业者需要关注结构性力量和政治关系,以便更全面地了解流行病和大流行病期间的不信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信