Running for Health? Polish Long-Distance Leisure Runnersand the Problem of Health Literacy

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
J. R. Stempień, Małgorzata Stańczyk, Jarosław Tokarski, M. Tkaczyk
{"title":"Running for Health? Polish Long-Distance Leisure Runnersand the Problem of Health Literacy","authors":"J. R. Stempień, Małgorzata Stańczyk, Jarosław Tokarski, M. Tkaczyk","doi":"10.26412/PSR211.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses a survey to investigate the problem of the health literacy of leisure runners. The survey was conducted in 2016 in Poland among 963 participants of the DOZ Marathon Lodz with PZU [Polish Insurance Company] . A specially developed scale for measuring the participants’ level of health literacy (−3, 23 points) was used, and the survey answers were evaluated by medical doctors. As the average score was 3.16, the surveyed population was shown to lack information about the medical and health consequences of running. The people who were relatively better informed were women and younger runners (and additionally single runners and those not active on the labor market). An unexpected finding was that social-class affiliation, educational level, and advancement in running ability had a low degree of influence on the health knowledge of the surveyed runners. The conclusion is that a health-related motivation to train in the sport of running (which was declared to be a key factor in many studies) is grounded in common knowledge, while the majority of leisure runners are unacquainted with the actual risks and benefits of running.","PeriodicalId":44204,"journal":{"name":"Polish Sociological Review","volume":"211 1","pages":"379-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26412/PSR211.07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article discusses a survey to investigate the problem of the health literacy of leisure runners. The survey was conducted in 2016 in Poland among 963 participants of the DOZ Marathon Lodz with PZU [Polish Insurance Company] . A specially developed scale for measuring the participants’ level of health literacy (−3, 23 points) was used, and the survey answers were evaluated by medical doctors. As the average score was 3.16, the surveyed population was shown to lack information about the medical and health consequences of running. The people who were relatively better informed were women and younger runners (and additionally single runners and those not active on the labor market). An unexpected finding was that social-class affiliation, educational level, and advancement in running ability had a low degree of influence on the health knowledge of the surveyed runners. The conclusion is that a health-related motivation to train in the sport of running (which was declared to be a key factor in many studies) is grounded in common knowledge, while the majority of leisure runners are unacquainted with the actual risks and benefits of running.
为健康而跑步?波兰长跑运动员与健康素养问题
本文对休闲跑者的健康素养问题进行了调查研究。这项调查于2016年在波兰PZU(波兰保险公司)对963名DOZ马拉松赛参与者进行。使用了一个专门开发的量表来测量参与者的健康素养水平(−3,23分),并由医生对调查结果进行评估。由于平均得分为3.16,调查人群缺乏关于跑步对医疗和健康影响的信息。相对而言,了解情况更好的是女性和年轻的跑步者(此外还有单身跑步者和不活跃于劳动力市场的人)。一个意想不到的发现是,社会阶层关系、教育水平和跑步能力的提高对受访跑步者的健康知识的影响程度较低。结论是,在跑步运动中训练的健康动机(在许多研究中被宣布为一个关键因素)是基于常识的,而大多数休闲跑步者不熟悉跑步的实际风险和好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信