The legal and policy contexts of ‘revenge porn’ criminalisation: the need for multiple approaches

Q3 Social Sciences
Tyrone Kirchengast, Thomas Crofts
{"title":"The legal and policy contexts of ‘revenge porn’ criminalisation: the need for multiple approaches","authors":"Tyrone Kirchengast, Thomas Crofts","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2019.1580518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The criminalisation of ‘revenge porn’ offending responds to the non-consensual distribution of intimate images. By smart device or computer, the ability to distribute images assumed to be private across public networks including social media has emerged as a serious twenty-first-century concern. Individual victims present as particularly vulnerable against the ability to disseminate images quickly. It can be a particularly heinous and harmful act, and removal of the offending images may not be guaranteed. Victims have previously been limited to older criminal offences of general application, in addition to civil law remedies ordering the removal of such images. Complexity and expense has often resulted in inaction. This article assesses the Australian context of ‘revenge porn’ criminalisation, arguing for a range of graduated and complementary responses from self-help to public education to the availability of a range of civil legal remedies and criminalisation.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"1 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2019.1580518","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2019.1580518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT The criminalisation of ‘revenge porn’ offending responds to the non-consensual distribution of intimate images. By smart device or computer, the ability to distribute images assumed to be private across public networks including social media has emerged as a serious twenty-first-century concern. Individual victims present as particularly vulnerable against the ability to disseminate images quickly. It can be a particularly heinous and harmful act, and removal of the offending images may not be guaranteed. Victims have previously been limited to older criminal offences of general application, in addition to civil law remedies ordering the removal of such images. Complexity and expense has often resulted in inaction. This article assesses the Australian context of ‘revenge porn’ criminalisation, arguing for a range of graduated and complementary responses from self-help to public education to the availability of a range of civil legal remedies and criminalisation.
“报复性色情”定罪的法律和政策背景:需要多种方法
摘要“报复性色情”犯罪的刑事定罪是对未经同意传播亲密图像的回应。通过智能设备或计算机,在包括社交媒体在内的公共网络上分发被认为是私人的图像的能力已成为21世纪的一个严重问题。受害者个人特别容易受到快速传播图像的能力的影响。这可能是一种特别令人发指和有害的行为,并且可能无法保证删除冒犯性的图像。受害者以前仅限于普遍适用的较老的刑事犯罪,此外还有下令删除此类图像的民法补救措施。复杂性和费用往往导致无所作为。本文评估了澳大利亚“报复性色情”刑事定罪的背景,主张从自助到公共教育,再到一系列民事法律补救和刑事定罪,采取一系列循序渐进的补充措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信