Whose digital Middle Ages? Accessibility in digital medieval manuscript culture

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Emily C. Francomano, Heather Bamford
{"title":"Whose digital Middle Ages? Accessibility in digital medieval manuscript culture","authors":"Emily C. Francomano, Heather Bamford","doi":"10.1080/17546559.2021.2022738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay examines why online availability should not be conflated with accessibility in discussions of the digital humanities and medieval studies. Expert-oriented projects and discussions of the digital humanities in medieval Iberian studies tend to get “lost in collation.” These projects lose sight of the promises of democratization and accessibility that the digital humanities community values in favor of the traditional demands of philology.","PeriodicalId":43210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"15 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17546559.2021.2022738","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This essay examines why online availability should not be conflated with accessibility in discussions of the digital humanities and medieval studies. Expert-oriented projects and discussions of the digital humanities in medieval Iberian studies tend to get “lost in collation.” These projects lose sight of the promises of democratization and accessibility that the digital humanities community values in favor of the traditional demands of philology.
谁的数字中世纪?数字中世纪手稿文化中的可访问性
本文探讨了为什么在讨论数字人文和中世纪研究时,在线可用性不应该与可访问性混为一谈。以专家为导向的项目和中世纪伊比利亚研究中数字人文学科的讨论往往会“迷失在整理中”。这些项目忽视了数字人文社区所看重的民主化和可访问性的承诺,而倾向于文献学的传统要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies
Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信