How rationality predicts individual perception of safety climate: An application of the hybrid model of learning in personality

Q4 Psychology
Martina Dwi Mustika, C. Jackson
{"title":"How rationality predicts individual perception of safety climate: An application of the hybrid model of learning in personality","authors":"Martina Dwi Mustika, C. Jackson","doi":"10.21580/PJPP.V5I1.5274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jackson’s (2008) Hybrid Model of Learning in Personality (HMLP) is designed to measure the effect of biological, socio-cognitive, and experiential processes of personality and learning mechanisms on developing rationality and directing functional or dysfunctional behaviors of employees. We use HMLP to determine if rational thinking predicts individual perception of safety climate. The results found that the proposed indirect paths of learning mechanisms significantly predict the individual perception of a safety climate through rationality. The goodness-of-fit demonstrated that the model provided a satisfactory fit: c2 = 13.200, p = 0.067; RMS = 0.000; RMSEA = 0.063; GFI = 0.981; AGFI = 0.943; and CFI = 0.988. As a result, we identify the importance of rationality in predicting individual safety climate and once again confirm the usefulness of HMLP in predicting useful workplace outcomes. The HMLP offers valuable insights into the influence of rationality in predicting individual perception of safety climate, as well as the underlying process of developing rationality.","PeriodicalId":31726,"journal":{"name":"Psikohumaniora Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikohumaniora Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21580/PJPP.V5I1.5274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jackson’s (2008) Hybrid Model of Learning in Personality (HMLP) is designed to measure the effect of biological, socio-cognitive, and experiential processes of personality and learning mechanisms on developing rationality and directing functional or dysfunctional behaviors of employees. We use HMLP to determine if rational thinking predicts individual perception of safety climate. The results found that the proposed indirect paths of learning mechanisms significantly predict the individual perception of a safety climate through rationality. The goodness-of-fit demonstrated that the model provided a satisfactory fit: c2 = 13.200, p = 0.067; RMS = 0.000; RMSEA = 0.063; GFI = 0.981; AGFI = 0.943; and CFI = 0.988. As a result, we identify the importance of rationality in predicting individual safety climate and once again confirm the usefulness of HMLP in predicting useful workplace outcomes. The HMLP offers valuable insights into the influence of rationality in predicting individual perception of safety climate, as well as the underlying process of developing rationality.
理性如何预测个人对安全环境的感知:人格中混合学习模型的应用
Jackson(2008)的人格学习混合模型(HMLP)旨在衡量人格的生物学、社会认知和经验过程以及学习机制对发展理性和指导员工功能性或功能性行为的影响。我们使用HMLP来确定理性思维是否能预测个人对安全环境的感知。结果发现,所提出的学习机制的间接路径通过理性显著预测了个体对安全氛围的感知。拟合优度表明,该模型提供了令人满意的拟合:c2=13.200,p=0.067;RMS=0.000;RMSEA=0.063;GFI=0.981;AGFI=0.943;CFI=0.988。因此,我们确定了理性在预测个人安全氛围方面的重要性,并再次证实了HMLP在预测有用的工作场所结果方面的有用性。HMLP为理性在预测个人对安全环境的感知方面的影响以及发展理性的潜在过程提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信