The formation of personal judgment in practical affairs: An epistemological view

Q1 Arts and Humanities
J. A. Lombo
{"title":"The formation of personal judgment in practical affairs: An epistemological view","authors":"J. A. Lombo","doi":"10.1080/23753234.2022.2035786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In our present cultural situation, we observe a growing expansion of information together with a proliferation of opinions and interpretations. This situation has been intensified by the health emergency caused by the Covid-19 virus. Our study aims to provide the keys for the formation of personal judgment in the practical field, so that it can indirectly serve as guidance for the management of information related to the pandemic. We will attempt to illustrate, first, the specificity of practical knowledge, describing its sources and conditions, as well as the scope of practical truth, which such judgment allows us to reach. Secondly, we will point out the factors that positively and negatively influence personal judgment. On the one hand, we will indicate some external elements that hinder or prevent access to information, such as misinformation, disinformation and fake news. On the other hand, we will focus on the internal dispositions of practical judgment, particularly the intellectual and moral virtues. In this context, we will deal in greater detail with prudence as a dianoetic virtue. We will conclude by pointing out the importance of the virtues in achieving critical thinking, and the importance of critical thinking in building stable access to information.","PeriodicalId":36858,"journal":{"name":"Church, Communication and Culture","volume":"7 1","pages":"58 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Church, Communication and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2022.2035786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In our present cultural situation, we observe a growing expansion of information together with a proliferation of opinions and interpretations. This situation has been intensified by the health emergency caused by the Covid-19 virus. Our study aims to provide the keys for the formation of personal judgment in the practical field, so that it can indirectly serve as guidance for the management of information related to the pandemic. We will attempt to illustrate, first, the specificity of practical knowledge, describing its sources and conditions, as well as the scope of practical truth, which such judgment allows us to reach. Secondly, we will point out the factors that positively and negatively influence personal judgment. On the one hand, we will indicate some external elements that hinder or prevent access to information, such as misinformation, disinformation and fake news. On the other hand, we will focus on the internal dispositions of practical judgment, particularly the intellectual and moral virtues. In this context, we will deal in greater detail with prudence as a dianoetic virtue. We will conclude by pointing out the importance of the virtues in achieving critical thinking, and the importance of critical thinking in building stable access to information.
实践中个人判断的形成:一种认识论观点
摘要在我们目前的文化环境中,我们观察到信息的不断扩展以及观点和解释的激增。新冠肺炎病毒引起的卫生紧急情况加剧了这种情况。我们的研究旨在为在实践领域形成个人判断提供关键,从而间接为疫情相关信息的管理提供指导。首先,我们将试图说明实践知识的特殊性,描述其来源和条件,以及这种判断使我们能够达到的实践真理的范围。其次,我们将指出积极和消极影响个人判断的因素。一方面,我们将指出一些阻碍或阻止获取信息的外部因素,如错误信息、虚假信息和假新闻。另一方面,我们将关注实践判断的内在倾向,特别是智力和道德美德。在这种背景下,我们将更详细地讨论谨慎作为一种道德美德。最后,我们将指出美德在实现批判性思维方面的重要性,以及批判性思维在建立稳定的信息获取渠道方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Church, Communication and Culture
Church, Communication and Culture Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信