Evaluating the Performance of HEC-HMS and SWAT Hydrological Models in Simulating the Rainfall-Runoff Process for Data Scarce Region of Ethiopian Rift Valley Lake Basin

Mohammedreshid A. Aliye, Alemu O. Aga, Teshale Tadesse, P. Yohannes
{"title":"Evaluating the Performance of HEC-HMS and SWAT Hydrological Models in Simulating the Rainfall-Runoff Process for Data Scarce Region of Ethiopian Rift Valley Lake Basin","authors":"Mohammedreshid A. Aliye, Alemu O. Aga, Teshale Tadesse, P. Yohannes","doi":"10.4236/ojmh.2020.104007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of physically-based and distributed \nwatershed models have been developed to model the hydrology of the watershed. \nFor a specific watershed, selecting the most suitable hydrological model is \nnecessary to obtain good simulated results. In this study, two hydrologic \nmodels, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and Hydrological Engineering \nCentre-The Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS), \nwere applied to predict streamflow in Katar River basin, Ethiopia. The \nperformances of these two models were compared in order to select the right \nmodel for the study basin. Both models were calibrated and validated with \nstream flow data of 11 years (1990-2000) and 7 years (2001-2007) respectively. \nNash-Sutcliffe Error (NSE) and Coefficient of Determination (R2) \nwere used to evaluate efficiency of the models. The results of calibration and \nvalidation indicated that, for river basin Katar, both models could simulate \nfairly well the streamflow. SWAT gave the model performance with the R2 > 0.78 and NSE > 0.67; and the HEC-HMS model provided the model \nperformance with the R2 > 0.87 and NSE > 0.73. Hence, the \nsimulated streamflow given by the HEC-HMS model is more satisfactory than that \nprovided by the SWAT model.","PeriodicalId":70695,"journal":{"name":"现代水文学期刊(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"现代水文学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmh.2020.104007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

A number of physically-based and distributed watershed models have been developed to model the hydrology of the watershed. For a specific watershed, selecting the most suitable hydrological model is necessary to obtain good simulated results. In this study, two hydrologic models, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and Hydrological Engineering Centre-The Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS), were applied to predict streamflow in Katar River basin, Ethiopia. The performances of these two models were compared in order to select the right model for the study basin. Both models were calibrated and validated with stream flow data of 11 years (1990-2000) and 7 years (2001-2007) respectively. Nash-Sutcliffe Error (NSE) and Coefficient of Determination (R2) were used to evaluate efficiency of the models. The results of calibration and validation indicated that, for river basin Katar, both models could simulate fairly well the streamflow. SWAT gave the model performance with the R2 > 0.78 and NSE > 0.67; and the HEC-HMS model provided the model performance with the R2 > 0.87 and NSE > 0.73. Hence, the simulated streamflow given by the HEC-HMS model is more satisfactory than that provided by the SWAT model.
HEC-HMS和SWAT水文模型在埃塞俄比亚裂谷湖流域数据匮乏地区模拟降雨径流过程中的性能评估
已经开发了许多基于物理的分布式流域模型来对流域的水文进行建模。对于特定的流域,选择最合适的水文模型是获得良好模拟结果的必要条件。在本研究中,土壤和水评估工具(SWAT)和水文工程中心水文建模系统(HEC-HMS)两个水文模型被用于预测埃塞俄比亚卡塔尔河流域的流量。比较了这两个模型的性能,以便为研究盆地选择合适的模型。这两个模型分别用11年(1990-2000年)和7年(2001-2007年)的流量数据进行了校准和验证。Nash-Sutcliffe误差(NSE)和决定系数(R2)用于评估模型的效率。校准和验证结果表明,对于Katar河流域,这两个模型都能很好地模拟径流。SWAT给出了R2>0.78和NSE>0.67的模型性能;HEC-HMS模型提供了R2>0.87和NSE>0.73的模型性能。因此,HEC-HMS模型给出的模拟流量比SWAT模型提供的模拟流量更令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信