Intuitive and analytical decision-making skills analysed through a flow developing serious game

IF 2.8 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Agnes Wimmer, Zoltán Buzády, Anita Csesznak, Peter Szentesi
{"title":"Intuitive and analytical decision-making skills analysed through a flow developing serious game","authors":"Agnes Wimmer, Zoltán Buzády, Anita Csesznak, Peter Szentesi","doi":"10.1080/12460125.2022.2073863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Serious games are tools for measuring, evaluating, and developing leadership skills through the decisions taken by participants on leadership training. We analyse decision-making skills in relation to 29 leadership skills measured through FLIGBY, a Flow-developing serious game. Our empirical research explores the intuitive versus the analytical decision-making approaches’ connections to other leadership skills demonstrated by 734 leaders and managers: through a series of complex management decisions made in the game. Participants gain deeper insights into their skill sets, experience the immediate consequences of their decisions, and enhance their personal competitiveness by developing their leadership skills. The novelty of our research lies in analysing the relationship between Flow theory, leadership skills, and particularly decision-making skills. We highlight which leadership skills are most relevant to analytical and intuitive thinking skills. Our results show that both decision-making approaches could support the Flow-promoting leadership style, however intuitive thinking has a stronger relationship with it.","PeriodicalId":45565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Decision Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Decision Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2073863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Serious games are tools for measuring, evaluating, and developing leadership skills through the decisions taken by participants on leadership training. We analyse decision-making skills in relation to 29 leadership skills measured through FLIGBY, a Flow-developing serious game. Our empirical research explores the intuitive versus the analytical decision-making approaches’ connections to other leadership skills demonstrated by 734 leaders and managers: through a series of complex management decisions made in the game. Participants gain deeper insights into their skill sets, experience the immediate consequences of their decisions, and enhance their personal competitiveness by developing their leadership skills. The novelty of our research lies in analysing the relationship between Flow theory, leadership skills, and particularly decision-making skills. We highlight which leadership skills are most relevant to analytical and intuitive thinking skills. Our results show that both decision-making approaches could support the Flow-promoting leadership style, however intuitive thinking has a stronger relationship with it.
直觉和分析的决策能力分析,通过流程发展严肃的游戏
摘要严肃游戏是通过参与者在领导力培训中做出的决定来衡量、评估和发展领导力的工具。我们分析了通过FLIGBY(一款Flow开发的严肃游戏)测量的29种领导技能与决策技能的关系。我们的实证研究探索了734位领导者和管理者所展示的直觉决策方法与分析决策方法与其他领导技能的联系:通过游戏中做出的一系列复杂的管理决策。参与者可以更深入地了解自己的技能,体验决策的直接后果,并通过发展领导技能来增强个人竞争力。我们研究的新颖之处在于分析Flow理论、领导技能,尤其是决策技能之间的关系。我们强调哪些领导技能与分析和直觉思维技能最相关。我们的研究结果表明,这两种决策方法都可以支持促进流动的领导风格,但直觉思维与之有更强的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Decision Systems
Journal of Decision Systems OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信