Khoa Dang Duong, Linh Thi Diem Truong, Tran Ngoc Bao Huynh, Quang T. Luu
{"title":"Financial constraints and the financial distress puzzle: Evidence from a frontier market before and during the Covid-19 pandemic","authors":"Khoa Dang Duong, Linh Thi Diem Truong, Tran Ngoc Bao Huynh, Quang T. Luu","doi":"10.1080/10293523.2022.2037202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We are the first ever to examine the financial constraints and distress risk puzzle of listed manufacturing firms in Vietnam. We employ different estimation methods such as portfolio sorting, Fama Macbeth regression, and asset pricing models to analyse a sample containing 27 300 firm-month observations from 2008 to 2021. Our empirical evidence figures out that the Z-score anomaly exists in the Vietnam stock market before the Covid-19 pandemic. The distress risk puzzle also exists after controlling for financial constraints and other firm characteristics. Moreover, the asset pricing model results conjecture that the distress risk is a priced factor. The average raw returns difference and risk-adjusted returns difference between stocks in the highest and lowest Z-score terciles are around 1% per month. However, we figure out that the Z-score puzzle disappears during the pandemic. Finally, our study employs a two-way sorting methodology to examine the causality between the distress puzzle and financial constraints. Our study figures out that distress risks cause higher financial constraints, not the other way around. Our findings support managers and policymakers in managing the default risk, especially during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":44496,"journal":{"name":"Investment Analysts Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"35 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2022.2037202","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
ABSTRACT We are the first ever to examine the financial constraints and distress risk puzzle of listed manufacturing firms in Vietnam. We employ different estimation methods such as portfolio sorting, Fama Macbeth regression, and asset pricing models to analyse a sample containing 27 300 firm-month observations from 2008 to 2021. Our empirical evidence figures out that the Z-score anomaly exists in the Vietnam stock market before the Covid-19 pandemic. The distress risk puzzle also exists after controlling for financial constraints and other firm characteristics. Moreover, the asset pricing model results conjecture that the distress risk is a priced factor. The average raw returns difference and risk-adjusted returns difference between stocks in the highest and lowest Z-score terciles are around 1% per month. However, we figure out that the Z-score puzzle disappears during the pandemic. Finally, our study employs a two-way sorting methodology to examine the causality between the distress puzzle and financial constraints. Our study figures out that distress risks cause higher financial constraints, not the other way around. Our findings support managers and policymakers in managing the default risk, especially during the pandemic.
期刊介绍:
The Investment Analysts Journal is an international, peer-reviewed journal, publishing high-quality, original research three times a year. The journal publishes significant new research in finance and investments and seeks to establish a balance between theoretical and empirical studies. Papers written in any areas of finance, investment, accounting and economics will be considered for publication. All contributions are welcome but are subject to an objective selection procedure to ensure that published articles answer the criteria of scientific objectivity, importance and replicability. Readability and good writing style are important. No articles which have been published or are under review elsewhere will be considered. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is double blind and submission is via email. Accepted papers will then pass through originality checking software. The editors reserve the right to make the final decision with respect to publication.