An evaluator’s reflections and lessons learned about gang intervention strategies: an agenda for research

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Caterina G. Roman
{"title":"An evaluator’s reflections and lessons learned about gang intervention strategies: an agenda for research","authors":"Caterina G. Roman","doi":"10.1108/jacpr-02-2021-0576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper is designed to critically review and analyze the body of research on a popular gang reduction strategy, implemented widely in the United States and a number of other countries, to: (1) assess whether researchers designed their evaluations to align with the theorized causal mechanisms that bring about reductions in violence; and (2) discuss how evidence on gang programs is generated and consumed. That review and assessment is then used to frame a research agenda for studying gang interventions.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA case study design is used to generate a multi-faceted understanding of the possible avenues for evaluation research on the law enforcement-based strategy known as the Group Violence Intervention. The paper discusses questions that remain to be answered about the strategy, such as “what type of deterrence is operating?” and if the model actually works by the threat of deterrence, and not by removing high-risk offenders and shootings from the street, what activities are needed to maintain the effect?\n\n\nFindings\nAcross roughly two dozen impact evaluations of GVI, none have examined the likely cause and effect components of this multi-partner strategy in reducing the violence. Furthermore, there are many issues related to the production and generation of criminal justice evaluation research that have adversely pushed the balance of evidence on what works in gang reduction toward law enforcement programming. However, there are many strategies that researchers can use to think broadly about appropriate and holistic research and evaluation on gangs and gang programming.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe recommendations for research, if implemented, can help build a body of knowledge to move toward community-based and restorative models of gang violence reduction.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis original piece is one of the first essays to contextualize and discuss how aspects of the production of social science research on gangs may directly impact what programs and strategies are implemented on the ground.\n","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-02-2021-0576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper is designed to critically review and analyze the body of research on a popular gang reduction strategy, implemented widely in the United States and a number of other countries, to: (1) assess whether researchers designed their evaluations to align with the theorized causal mechanisms that bring about reductions in violence; and (2) discuss how evidence on gang programs is generated and consumed. That review and assessment is then used to frame a research agenda for studying gang interventions. Design/methodology/approach A case study design is used to generate a multi-faceted understanding of the possible avenues for evaluation research on the law enforcement-based strategy known as the Group Violence Intervention. The paper discusses questions that remain to be answered about the strategy, such as “what type of deterrence is operating?” and if the model actually works by the threat of deterrence, and not by removing high-risk offenders and shootings from the street, what activities are needed to maintain the effect? Findings Across roughly two dozen impact evaluations of GVI, none have examined the likely cause and effect components of this multi-partner strategy in reducing the violence. Furthermore, there are many issues related to the production and generation of criminal justice evaluation research that have adversely pushed the balance of evidence on what works in gang reduction toward law enforcement programming. However, there are many strategies that researchers can use to think broadly about appropriate and holistic research and evaluation on gangs and gang programming. Practical implications The recommendations for research, if implemented, can help build a body of knowledge to move toward community-based and restorative models of gang violence reduction. Originality/value This original piece is one of the first essays to contextualize and discuss how aspects of the production of social science research on gangs may directly impact what programs and strategies are implemented on the ground.
评估者对帮派干预策略的反思和经验教训:研究议程
本文旨在批判性地回顾和分析在美国和其他一些国家广泛实施的流行帮派减少策略的研究主体,以:(1)评估研究人员设计的评估是否与减少暴力的理论化因果机制相一致;(2)讨论关于帮派活动的证据是如何产生和消耗的。然后,这种审查和评估被用来制定研究帮派干预的研究议程。设计/方法/方法案例研究的设计是用来产生一个可能的途径,以评估研究的执法为基础的战略,被称为群体暴力干预的多角度的理解。本文讨论了关于该战略仍有待回答的问题,如“何种威慑在起作用?”“如果这种模式实际上是通过威慑的威胁而起作用,而不是通过将高风险罪犯和枪击事件从街上清除,那么需要采取哪些活动来维持效果?”在对全球暴力指数进行的大约24项影响评估中,没有一项评估研究了这种多方合作策略在减少暴力方面可能的因果关系。此外,还有许多与刑事司法评估研究的产生和产生有关的问题,这些问题不利地推动了关于减少帮派的证据的平衡,而不是执法方案。然而,研究人员可以使用许多策略来广泛地思考对帮派和帮派规划进行适当和全面的研究和评估。实际意义这些研究建议如果得到实施,可以帮助建立一个知识体系,从而朝着以社区为基础的、恢复性的减少帮派暴力模式迈进。原创性/价值这篇原创文章是第一批将社会科学研究成果的各个方面置于背景下并讨论如何直接影响在当地实施的项目和策略的文章之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信