To Ensure the Learning of Every Child with a Disability.

R. Mainzer, D. Deshler, M. R. Coleman, E. Kozleski, Matty Rodriguez-Walling
{"title":"To Ensure the Learning of Every Child with a Disability.","authors":"R. Mainzer, D. Deshler, M. R. Coleman, E. Kozleski, Matty Rodriguez-Walling","doi":"10.17161/FOEC.V35I5.6797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, students with disabilities are identified earlier, attend school, graduate and go on to post-secondary education and jobs in larger numbers, and learn in more inclusive settings than ever in history (American Youth Policy Forum & Center for Education Policy, 2001). Special education outcomes have never been more positive. Too many students with disabilities, however, still do not graduate from high school, too many are excluded from challenging learning outcomes, too many do not successfully make the transition to independence, and too many end up living lonely, unproductive lives. These quality-of-life indices are inextricably linked to the quality of education that people with disabilities experience. Even though access to a free and appropriate education has been achieved, the educational quality of that experience remains problematic. The progress that special education has made in its three brief decades of existence is remarkable. Nevertheless, in the same spirit of social justice and advocacy in which special education was born and nurtured, special educators continue to advocate for improvements in the education of students with exceptionalities (Kode, 2002). Today, rather than advocating for inclusion in public education, special educators are working within the general education community to gain genuine access for students with disabilities to the challenging educational results that most individuals in our society take for granted. The push for research-based practice and results-driven accountability is being compromised by a crisis within the special education profession: Special educators labor under work conditions that contribute to attrition rates in special education that are twice as high as those of general educators (NCES, 2000). Recognizing this burgeoning problem, the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) established a CEC Presidential Commission on the Conditions of Teaching in Special Education. The Commission (Kozleski, Mainzer, Deshler, Coleman, & Rodriquez-Walling, 2000) identified three outcomes fundamental to ensuring high and challenging learning results for every exceptional learner:","PeriodicalId":89924,"journal":{"name":"Focus on exceptional children","volume":"35 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on exceptional children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/FOEC.V35I5.6797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Today, students with disabilities are identified earlier, attend school, graduate and go on to post-secondary education and jobs in larger numbers, and learn in more inclusive settings than ever in history (American Youth Policy Forum & Center for Education Policy, 2001). Special education outcomes have never been more positive. Too many students with disabilities, however, still do not graduate from high school, too many are excluded from challenging learning outcomes, too many do not successfully make the transition to independence, and too many end up living lonely, unproductive lives. These quality-of-life indices are inextricably linked to the quality of education that people with disabilities experience. Even though access to a free and appropriate education has been achieved, the educational quality of that experience remains problematic. The progress that special education has made in its three brief decades of existence is remarkable. Nevertheless, in the same spirit of social justice and advocacy in which special education was born and nurtured, special educators continue to advocate for improvements in the education of students with exceptionalities (Kode, 2002). Today, rather than advocating for inclusion in public education, special educators are working within the general education community to gain genuine access for students with disabilities to the challenging educational results that most individuals in our society take for granted. The push for research-based practice and results-driven accountability is being compromised by a crisis within the special education profession: Special educators labor under work conditions that contribute to attrition rates in special education that are twice as high as those of general educators (NCES, 2000). Recognizing this burgeoning problem, the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) established a CEC Presidential Commission on the Conditions of Teaching in Special Education. The Commission (Kozleski, Mainzer, Deshler, Coleman, & Rodriquez-Walling, 2000) identified three outcomes fundamental to ensuring high and challenging learning results for every exceptional learner:
确保每一个残疾儿童的学习。
今天,残疾学生被更早地识别出来,上学、毕业并继续接受高等教育和工作的人数更多,并且在比历史上任何时候都更具包容性的环境中学习(美国青年政策论坛和教育政策中心,2001年)。特殊教育的成果从未如此积极。然而,仍然有太多的残疾学生没有从高中毕业,太多的人被排除在具有挑战性的学习成果之外,太多的人没有成功地过渡到独立,太多的人最终过着孤独、毫无成果的生活。这些生活质量指数与残疾人所接受的教育质量有着密不可分的联系。尽管获得免费和适当的教育的机会已经实现,但这种经历的教育质量仍然存在问题。特殊教育在短短的三十年中取得的进步是显著的。然而,本着特殊教育诞生和发展的社会正义和倡导精神,特殊教育工作者继续倡导改善特殊学生的教育(Kode, 2002)。今天,特殊教育工作者不再倡导公共教育的包容性,而是在普通教育界工作,为残疾学生获得真正的机会,让他们获得具有挑战性的教育成果,而我们社会中的大多数人都认为这是理所当然的。推动以研究为基础的实践和以结果为导向的问责制正在受到特殊教育行业危机的影响:特殊教育工作者在工作条件下的劳动导致特殊教育的流失率是普通教育工作者的两倍(NCES, 2000)。认识到这一迅速发展的问题,特殊儿童委员会(CEC)成立了CEC特殊教育教学条件总统委员会。委员会(Kozleski, Mainzer, Deshler, Coleman, & Rodriquez-Walling, 2000)确定了三个基本结果,以确保每个优秀学习者获得高水平和具有挑战性的学习结果:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信