{"title":"Towards a Shared Practice of Encampment: An Historical Investigation of UNRWA and the UNHCR to 1967","authors":"L. Robson","doi":"10.1093/jrs/fead045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article reconsiders refugee studies’ longstanding commitment to the notion of a near-total separation between the UNHCR and UNRWA through an historical investigation of both organizations’ early approaches to refugee encampment. Without disputing the importance of the historical and institutional divisions between the two, it seeks to point out that with respect to the practice of encampment, the two agencies gradually drew nearer to each other during their first two decades of operation, as the UNHCR extended its reach into the decolonizing world and UNRWA expanded its operations across the Middle East. The parallels became particularly clear in 1967, when the ‘Protocol on the Status of Refugees’ formalized the UNHCR’s encampment-focused expansion into the decolonizing world at roughly the same time that the second Arab-Israeli war created the conditions for UNRWA to enshrine encampment as a more or less permanent institutional strategy.","PeriodicalId":51464,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Refugee Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Refugee Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fead045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article reconsiders refugee studies’ longstanding commitment to the notion of a near-total separation between the UNHCR and UNRWA through an historical investigation of both organizations’ early approaches to refugee encampment. Without disputing the importance of the historical and institutional divisions between the two, it seeks to point out that with respect to the practice of encampment, the two agencies gradually drew nearer to each other during their first two decades of operation, as the UNHCR extended its reach into the decolonizing world and UNRWA expanded its operations across the Middle East. The parallels became particularly clear in 1967, when the ‘Protocol on the Status of Refugees’ formalized the UNHCR’s encampment-focused expansion into the decolonizing world at roughly the same time that the second Arab-Israeli war created the conditions for UNRWA to enshrine encampment as a more or less permanent institutional strategy.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Refugee Studies provides a forum for exploration of the complex problems of forced migration and national, regional and international responses. The Journal covers all categories of forcibly displaced people. Contributions that develop theoretical understandings of forced migration, or advance knowledge of concepts, policies and practice are welcomed from both academics and practitioners. Journal of Refugee Studies is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, and is published in association with the Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford.