Analysing the relationship between diversification strategy and firm performance: the role of the economic cycle

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS
Esteban López Zapata
{"title":"Analysing the relationship between diversification strategy and firm performance: the role of the economic cycle","authors":"Esteban López Zapata","doi":"10.5295/CDG.170738EL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[EN] The relationship between corporate strategies and firm performance has been one of the key debates in the discipline of Strategic Management. There are studies that analyse the moderating role that certain variables may play in that relationship. These variables tend to refer to aspects within the firm or, at the very least, within the competitive environment in which a firm operates. Nevertheless, the empirical evidence on the part the general environment plays from an economic perspective is much less common, and focuses on large corporations and on periods of economic growth. Accordingly, using a panel of 1,828 Spanish manufacturing firms of different sizes, an analysis is conducted of the differences in Return On Assets (ROA), Growth in Sales (GS) and Labor Productivity (LP) between specialised firms, those with related diversification, and those with unrelated diversification, between 2002 and 2011, in which there was a period of growth alternated with another one of economic recession. Although some superiority is noted of related diversification and specialisation over unrelated diversification, the differences between strategies are less significant in periods of economic recession, and vary according to the dimension of performance considered. These results reveal the need to consider the economic cycle as a contingent factor that affects the impact corporate strategies have on firm performance.","PeriodicalId":43351,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Gestion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Gestion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5295/CDG.170738EL","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

[EN] The relationship between corporate strategies and firm performance has been one of the key debates in the discipline of Strategic Management. There are studies that analyse the moderating role that certain variables may play in that relationship. These variables tend to refer to aspects within the firm or, at the very least, within the competitive environment in which a firm operates. Nevertheless, the empirical evidence on the part the general environment plays from an economic perspective is much less common, and focuses on large corporations and on periods of economic growth. Accordingly, using a panel of 1,828 Spanish manufacturing firms of different sizes, an analysis is conducted of the differences in Return On Assets (ROA), Growth in Sales (GS) and Labor Productivity (LP) between specialised firms, those with related diversification, and those with unrelated diversification, between 2002 and 2011, in which there was a period of growth alternated with another one of economic recession. Although some superiority is noted of related diversification and specialisation over unrelated diversification, the differences between strategies are less significant in periods of economic recession, and vary according to the dimension of performance considered. These results reveal the need to consider the economic cycle as a contingent factor that affects the impact corporate strategies have on firm performance.
多元化战略与企业绩效的关系分析:经济周期的作用
[EN]企业战略与企业绩效之间的关系一直是战略管理学科中的关键争论之一。有研究分析了某些变量在这种关系中可能发挥的调节作用。这些变量往往指的是公司内部的各个方面,或者至少是公司运营的竞争环境中的各个方面。然而,从经济角度来看,关于大环境所起作用的实证证据要少得多,主要集中在大公司和经济增长时期。因此,使用一个由1828家不同规模的西班牙制造业公司组成的小组,分析了2002年至2011年间专业公司、相关多元化公司和非相关多元化公司在资产回报率(ROA)、销售额增长率(GS)和劳动生产率(LP)方面的差异,其中有一段增长期,另一段是经济衰退期。尽管与不相关的多元化相比,相关的多元化和专业化具有一定的优势,但在经济衰退时期,战略之间的差异并不显著,并且根据所考虑的绩效维度而有所不同。这些结果表明,有必要将经济周期视为影响企业战略对企业绩效影响的一个偶然因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
27
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信