Mapping the Settlements of Slavic Tribes of the Zarubyntsi Culture of the 3rd Century BC — 2nd Century AD

Oleksii Trachuk
{"title":"Mapping the Settlements of Slavic Tribes of the Zarubyntsi Culture of the 3rd Century BC — 2nd Century AD","authors":"Oleksii Trachuk","doi":"10.30840/2413-7065.4(85).2022.268113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethnological studies of the Slavic tribes of the Nevrians, Scythians-farmers and Scythians-ploughmen of the 7th–3rd centuries BC in the Middle and Upper Dnieper region on the territory of Ukraine, Belarus and the Russian Federation, which were published in the previous issues of the \"Ukrainoznavstvo\" journal, approved a new method of socio-cultural anthropology – the method of tribal geography. It was established that in the social life of East Slavic tribes, the main participant was the clan, and not the patriarchal family, family or neighborhood community. Despite the appearance of the works of Bachofen, McLennan, Morgan, Kovalevsky, Kosven and other researchers, Soviet ideas about the patriarchal family as the embryo of society have not yet disappeared in archeology, and the relationship to the community, family and tribe has not yet changed. Archaeologists are still investigating the ethnically undefined bearers of archaeological cultures.But archaeologists know that the tribal system and the placement of ancestral settlements in nests existed on all continents of the planet since the Paleolithic era. Therefore, tribal geography opens up new opportunities for researching the lands inhabited by Slavic tribes - the ancestors of the Ukrainian people, which is of great interest all over the world. Elements of historical geography in the study of the ethnogenesis of the Slavs at the beginning of the 20th century used by V. Khvoika, researching about 500 settlements of different times in Ukraine. L. Niederle developed a map of the resettlement of Slavic tribes from the areas of initial residence, which, according to B. Rybakov's observations, corresponds to the main contours of the territory of the settlement of the Slavs for two millennia. Systematic cartographic studies of the settlements of the Slavic tribes of the Upper Dnieper region were carried out by L. Pobol, a supporter of V. Khvoika's autochthonous theory of the origin of the Slavs. The St. Petersburg school of archaeologists (M. Shchukin, V. Yeremenko, K. Kasparova), which adheres to the migration theory, still opposes the autochthonous theory. Ukrainian researcher S. Pachkova successfully proves the fallacy of the migration theory. We have collected the material of the nest cluster of Zarubyntsi culture settlements in the period of the 3rd century BC – 2nd century AD on modern maps at a scale of 1:850,000 for Belarus and 1:250,000 for Ukraine and the Russian Federation and it confirms the autochthonous theory of the origin of the Slavs and, including, the autochthonousness of the Ukrainian people. These and subsequent similar studies make it possible to reveal the characteristic features of the ethnogenesis of Ukrainian Slavs from the annalistic tribes of Kievan Rus to the Iron, Bronze, and Copper Ages.","PeriodicalId":52730,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayinoznavstvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayinoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30840/2413-7065.4(85).2022.268113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethnological studies of the Slavic tribes of the Nevrians, Scythians-farmers and Scythians-ploughmen of the 7th–3rd centuries BC in the Middle and Upper Dnieper region on the territory of Ukraine, Belarus and the Russian Federation, which were published in the previous issues of the "Ukrainoznavstvo" journal, approved a new method of socio-cultural anthropology – the method of tribal geography. It was established that in the social life of East Slavic tribes, the main participant was the clan, and not the patriarchal family, family or neighborhood community. Despite the appearance of the works of Bachofen, McLennan, Morgan, Kovalevsky, Kosven and other researchers, Soviet ideas about the patriarchal family as the embryo of society have not yet disappeared in archeology, and the relationship to the community, family and tribe has not yet changed. Archaeologists are still investigating the ethnically undefined bearers of archaeological cultures.But archaeologists know that the tribal system and the placement of ancestral settlements in nests existed on all continents of the planet since the Paleolithic era. Therefore, tribal geography opens up new opportunities for researching the lands inhabited by Slavic tribes - the ancestors of the Ukrainian people, which is of great interest all over the world. Elements of historical geography in the study of the ethnogenesis of the Slavs at the beginning of the 20th century used by V. Khvoika, researching about 500 settlements of different times in Ukraine. L. Niederle developed a map of the resettlement of Slavic tribes from the areas of initial residence, which, according to B. Rybakov's observations, corresponds to the main contours of the territory of the settlement of the Slavs for two millennia. Systematic cartographic studies of the settlements of the Slavic tribes of the Upper Dnieper region were carried out by L. Pobol, a supporter of V. Khvoika's autochthonous theory of the origin of the Slavs. The St. Petersburg school of archaeologists (M. Shchukin, V. Yeremenko, K. Kasparova), which adheres to the migration theory, still opposes the autochthonous theory. Ukrainian researcher S. Pachkova successfully proves the fallacy of the migration theory. We have collected the material of the nest cluster of Zarubyntsi culture settlements in the period of the 3rd century BC – 2nd century AD on modern maps at a scale of 1:850,000 for Belarus and 1:250,000 for Ukraine and the Russian Federation and it confirms the autochthonous theory of the origin of the Slavs and, including, the autochthonousness of the Ukrainian people. These and subsequent similar studies make it possible to reveal the characteristic features of the ethnogenesis of Ukrainian Slavs from the annalistic tribes of Kievan Rus to the Iron, Bronze, and Copper Ages.
绘制了公元前3世纪至公元2世纪的扎鲁比茨文化的斯拉夫部落的定居点
对乌克兰、白俄罗斯和俄罗斯联邦境内第聂伯河中上游地区公元前7世纪至3世纪的Nevarian、Scythians-farmers和Scythian-ploughmen斯拉夫部落的民族学研究发表在前几期的《Ukrinoznavstvo》杂志上,批准了一种新的社会文化人类学方法&部落地理学方法。已经确定,在东斯拉夫部落的社会生活中,主要参与者是氏族,而不是父权制的家庭、家庭或邻里社区。尽管出现了巴霍芬、麦克伦南、摩根、科瓦列夫斯基、科斯文等研究者的作品,但苏联关于父权家庭作为社会胚胎的思想在考古学中尚未消失,与社区、家庭和部落的关系也尚未改变。考古学家仍在调查考古文化的不明确的种族承载者。但考古学家知道,自旧石器时代以来,地球上所有大陆都存在部落制度和祖先定居点的巢穴。因此,部落地理学为研究斯拉夫部落——乌克兰人的祖先——所居住的土地开辟了新的机会,这在全世界都引起了极大的兴趣。V.Khvoika在20世纪初研究斯拉夫民族起源时使用的历史地理元素,研究了乌克兰大约500个不同时期的定居点。L.Niederle绘制了一张斯拉夫部落从最初居住的地区重新定居的地图,根据B.Rybakov的观察,这张地图对应了两千年来斯拉夫人定居的主要轮廓。L.Pobol对上第聂伯河地区斯拉夫部落的定居点进行了系统的制图研究,他是V.Khvoika斯拉夫人起源的本土理论的支持者。圣彼得堡考古学家学派(M.Shchukin,V.Yeremeko,K.Kasparova)坚持移民理论,但仍然反对本土理论。乌克兰研究人员帕奇科娃成功地证明了移民理论的谬误。我们在现代地图上收集了公元前3世纪至公元2世纪Zarubyntsi文化定居点巢群的材料,白俄罗斯的比例为1:850000,乌克兰和俄罗斯联邦的比例为1:250000,这证实了斯拉夫人起源的本土理论,包括乌克兰人的本土理论。这些和随后的类似研究使我们有可能揭示乌克兰斯拉夫人从基文罗斯的编年史部落到铁、青铜和铜时代的民族起源特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信