Impact of Chronic Disease State Management by Clinical Pharmacists on Diabetes Outcomes: Interim Results of a Prospective Pilot Study

C. McCarthy, M. Bateman
{"title":"Impact of Chronic Disease State Management by Clinical Pharmacists on Diabetes Outcomes: Interim Results of a Prospective Pilot Study","authors":"C. McCarthy, M. Bateman","doi":"10.31038/edmj.2018245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To provide program methodology and outcomes data identifying the impact of clinical pharmacy services provided to patients with diabetes mellitus. Design: Prospective pilot study. Patients: Adult patients with diabetes mellitus identified by a member of the primary care team were referred to the pharmacist-led disease state management program, a patient-centered medication therapy management (MTM) program developed through university collaboration with a local Federally Qualified Health Center. Interventions: Pharmacist-delivered disease state management and medication therapy management across three or more face-to-face encounters over the course of six months. Main outcome measures: Clinical outcomes were followed for 6 months from the time of referral and enrollment into the program. The primary diabetes endpoint, glycosylated hemoglobin, and patient-reported experience with care were collected at baseline and the end of the study. Clinical pharmacists documented the content of clinical visits, including the number of visits per patient, duration of encounters, number and proportion of identified medication therapy problems, and the number and proportion of associated interventions to optimize pharmacotherapy. Results: Glycosylated hemoglobin was significantly reduced versus baseline at the 6-month assessment in both the intent-to-treat (−2.7%; P < 0.0001) and the per-protocol groups (−3.0%; P < 0.0001). Patient-reported satisfaction with care was higher for the pharmacists as compared to the primary care providers with significantly more patients rating the care received from the pharmacist as excellent ( P = 0.001). The pharmacists completed 158 visits, identifying and resolving an average of 7.7 medication therapy problems for each subject included in the analysis. Conclusion: In this model of MTM, the clinical pharmacists were able to identify and resolve interventions which subsequently resulted in statistically significant reductions observed in the primary diabetes endpoint and high levels of satisfaction with care.","PeriodicalId":72911,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/edmj.2018245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide program methodology and outcomes data identifying the impact of clinical pharmacy services provided to patients with diabetes mellitus. Design: Prospective pilot study. Patients: Adult patients with diabetes mellitus identified by a member of the primary care team were referred to the pharmacist-led disease state management program, a patient-centered medication therapy management (MTM) program developed through university collaboration with a local Federally Qualified Health Center. Interventions: Pharmacist-delivered disease state management and medication therapy management across three or more face-to-face encounters over the course of six months. Main outcome measures: Clinical outcomes were followed for 6 months from the time of referral and enrollment into the program. The primary diabetes endpoint, glycosylated hemoglobin, and patient-reported experience with care were collected at baseline and the end of the study. Clinical pharmacists documented the content of clinical visits, including the number of visits per patient, duration of encounters, number and proportion of identified medication therapy problems, and the number and proportion of associated interventions to optimize pharmacotherapy. Results: Glycosylated hemoglobin was significantly reduced versus baseline at the 6-month assessment in both the intent-to-treat (−2.7%; P < 0.0001) and the per-protocol groups (−3.0%; P < 0.0001). Patient-reported satisfaction with care was higher for the pharmacists as compared to the primary care providers with significantly more patients rating the care received from the pharmacist as excellent ( P = 0.001). The pharmacists completed 158 visits, identifying and resolving an average of 7.7 medication therapy problems for each subject included in the analysis. Conclusion: In this model of MTM, the clinical pharmacists were able to identify and resolve interventions which subsequently resulted in statistically significant reductions observed in the primary diabetes endpoint and high levels of satisfaction with care.
临床药师慢性疾病状态管理对糖尿病结局的影响:一项前瞻性试点研究的中期结果
目的:提供项目方法和结果数据,以确定临床药学服务对糖尿病患者的影响。设计:前瞻性试点研究。患者:初级保健团队的一名成员确定的成年糖尿病患者被转介至药剂师领导的疾病状态管理计划,这是一个以患者为中心的药物治疗管理(MTM)计划,是通过大学与当地联邦合格健康中心的合作开发的。干预措施:药剂师在六个月的时间里,通过三次或三次以上的面对面交流,提供疾病状态管理和药物治疗管理。主要结果指标:从转诊和纳入该项目开始,对临床结果进行了6个月的随访。在基线和研究结束时收集主要糖尿病终点、糖化血红蛋白和患者报告的护理经验。临床药剂师记录了临床就诊的内容,包括每位患者的就诊次数、就诊持续时间、发现的药物治疗问题的数量和比例,以及优化药物治疗的相关干预措施的数量和比率。结果:在6个月的评估中,意向治疗组(-2.7%;P<0.0001)和方案组(-3.0%;P<0.0001优秀(P=0.001)。药剂师完成了158次就诊,为分析中的每个受试者确定并解决了平均7.7个药物治疗问题。结论:在这种MTM模型中,临床药剂师能够识别和解决干预措施,这些干预措施随后导致原发性糖尿病终点的统计学显著降低和对护理的高满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信