Preanesthetic Evaluation and Preparation for Neurosurgical Procedures: An Indian Perspective

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A. Bindra, S. Bharadwaj, Nitasha Mishra, D. Masapu, S. Bhargava, A. Luthra, M. Marda, A. Hrishi, H. Bhagat, P. Bidkar, Ponniah Vanamoorthy, Zulfiqar Ali, M. Khan
{"title":"Preanesthetic Evaluation and Preparation for Neurosurgical Procedures: An Indian Perspective","authors":"A. Bindra, S. Bharadwaj, Nitasha Mishra, D. Masapu, S. Bhargava, A. Luthra, M. Marda, A. Hrishi, H. Bhagat, P. Bidkar, Ponniah Vanamoorthy, Zulfiqar Ali, M. Khan","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1749649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background A questionnaire-based survey was conducted to determine the preanesthetic evaluation (PAE) practices among the members of the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care (ISNACC). The survey aimed to assess the current clinical practice of PAE and optimization of neurosurgical patients in India.\n Methods An online questionnaire was designed by the working group of ISNACC and circulated among its active members. Response to individual questions was considered significant if 50% or more respondents concurred. The survey questions to which less than 50% of respondents concurred were identified as inconclusive results.\n Results Out of 438 active ISNACC members, 218 responded. Responses were obtained from various parts of the country. The majority of participants were practicing neuroanesthesiology. Questions asked were regarding clinical assessment, preoperative optimization, prognostication, and airway management in neurosurgery. More than 50% of practitioners acceded to most of the questions; however, the percentage of responses varied across different questions (50–100%). The questions related to preoperative duplex scanning in chronically immobilized patients, preoperative cognitive testing, and risk stratification during neurosurgical procedures received an inconclusive response (< 50%).\n Conclusion The survey highlights the variable PAE practices perused by ISNACC members across the country. A guideline for uniform PAE practices may help to enhance research and improve perioperative care.","PeriodicalId":16574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1749649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background A questionnaire-based survey was conducted to determine the preanesthetic evaluation (PAE) practices among the members of the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care (ISNACC). The survey aimed to assess the current clinical practice of PAE and optimization of neurosurgical patients in India. Methods An online questionnaire was designed by the working group of ISNACC and circulated among its active members. Response to individual questions was considered significant if 50% or more respondents concurred. The survey questions to which less than 50% of respondents concurred were identified as inconclusive results. Results Out of 438 active ISNACC members, 218 responded. Responses were obtained from various parts of the country. The majority of participants were practicing neuroanesthesiology. Questions asked were regarding clinical assessment, preoperative optimization, prognostication, and airway management in neurosurgery. More than 50% of practitioners acceded to most of the questions; however, the percentage of responses varied across different questions (50–100%). The questions related to preoperative duplex scanning in chronically immobilized patients, preoperative cognitive testing, and risk stratification during neurosurgical procedures received an inconclusive response (< 50%). Conclusion The survey highlights the variable PAE practices perused by ISNACC members across the country. A guideline for uniform PAE practices may help to enhance research and improve perioperative care.
从印度人的角度看神经外科手术的术前评估和准备
背景 进行了一项基于问卷的调查,以确定印度神经麻醉学和重症监护学会(ISNACC)成员的麻醉前评估(PAE)实践。该调查旨在评估目前PAE的临床实践和印度神经外科患者的优化情况。方法 ISNACC工作组设计了一份在线问卷,并在其活跃成员中分发。如果50%或以上的受访者表示同意,则认为对个别问题的回答意义重大。只有不到50%的受访者表示同意的调查问题被认定为不确定的结果。后果 在438名活跃的ISNACC成员中,218人作出了回应。收到了来自该国各地的答复。大多数参与者都在练习神经麻醉学。提出的问题涉及神经外科的临床评估、术前优化、预后和气道管理。超过50%的从业者同意了大多数问题;然而,不同问题的回答比例各不相同(50-100%)。与慢性固定患者的术前双重扫描、术前认知测试和神经外科手术中的风险分层相关的问题得到了不确定的回答(<50%)。结论 该调查强调了ISNACC成员在全国范围内仔细研究的可变PAE实践。统一的PAE实践指南可能有助于加强研究和改善围手术期护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care
Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信