{"title":"À Denys: Tracing Jean-Luc Marion’s Dionysian Hermeneutics","authors":"J. Pearl","doi":"10.5840/studphaen20202014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since his 1977 The Idol and Distance (L’idole et la distance), Jean-Luc Marion has almost continually drawn upon the work of the 5th-6th century Christian mystic Pseudo-Denys the Areopagite (Pseudo-Dionysius), not only within his explicitly theological considerations, but throughout his Cartesian and phenomenological work as well. The present essay maps out the influence of Denys upon Marion’s thinking, organizing Marion’s career into a three-part periodization, each of which corresponds to a distinct portion of the Dionysian corpus—in Marion’s work of the seventies the Celestial Hierarchy and the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy are foregrounded, in the eighties this emphasis is shifted to the The Divine Names, and in the nineties The Mystical Theology takes center stage. Insofar as these emphases directly correlate to the unique tasks that Marion has set himself in each of these various periods, Dionysius is revealed as a hermeneutical key, unlocking and clarifying crucial aspects of Marion’s theologically-inflected phenomenology.","PeriodicalId":42801,"journal":{"name":"Studia Phaenomenologica","volume":"20 1","pages":"307-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Phaenomenologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/studphaen20202014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since his 1977 The Idol and Distance (L’idole et la distance), Jean-Luc Marion has almost continually drawn upon the work of the 5th-6th century Christian mystic Pseudo-Denys the Areopagite (Pseudo-Dionysius), not only within his explicitly theological considerations, but throughout his Cartesian and phenomenological work as well. The present essay maps out the influence of Denys upon Marion’s thinking, organizing Marion’s career into a three-part periodization, each of which corresponds to a distinct portion of the Dionysian corpus—in Marion’s work of the seventies the Celestial Hierarchy and the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy are foregrounded, in the eighties this emphasis is shifted to the The Divine Names, and in the nineties The Mystical Theology takes center stage. Insofar as these emphases directly correlate to the unique tasks that Marion has set himself in each of these various periods, Dionysius is revealed as a hermeneutical key, unlocking and clarifying crucial aspects of Marion’s theologically-inflected phenomenology.
自1977年的《偶像与距离》(L’idole et la Distance)以来,让-吕克·马里恩几乎一直在借鉴5-6世纪基督教神秘主义者阿留帕派伪丹尼斯(伪酒神)的作品,不仅在他明确的神学考虑范围内,而且在他的笛卡尔和现象学作品中也是如此。本文描绘了丹尼斯对马里昂思想的影响,将马里昂的职业生涯分为三个部分,每个部分都对应着酒神语料库的一个不同部分——在马里昂70年代的作品中,天体层次和教会层次是预先确定的,在80年代,重点转移到了《神圣的名字》,在90年代,神秘神学占据了中心舞台。就这些重点与马里昂在这些不同时期为自己设定的独特任务直接相关而言,狄奥尼修斯被揭示为一把解释学的钥匙,开启并澄清了马里昂神学变形现象学的关键方面。