Disentangling the Consequences of Systemic Racism and Clinical Paranoia to Promote Effectiveness of a Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Persecutory Delusions in Minoritized Individuals: A Case-Example

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
A. Moussa-Tooks, Julia M. Sheffield, D. Freeman, Aaron P. Brinen
{"title":"Disentangling the Consequences of Systemic Racism and Clinical Paranoia to Promote Effectiveness of a Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Persecutory Delusions in Minoritized Individuals: A Case-Example","authors":"A. Moussa-Tooks, Julia M. Sheffield, D. Freeman, Aaron P. Brinen","doi":"10.1177/15346501231190920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While everyone experiences threats, some threats are culturally specific and not universally recognized or addressed by providers. A prominent example is threat-based worry and hypervigilance in Black Americans and other minoritized individuals, which is higher due to systemic racism and increases risk for psychopathology like clinically significant paranoia. To date, there have been no adaptations of cognitive-behavioral therapies for Black Americans with psychosis, despite the long-standing history of systemic racism in the United States, and its increasingly recognized contribution to psychotic experiences. Accordingly, we present the first step towards developing an adapted cognitive-behavioral intervention for Black and minoritized Americans with psychosis. This adaptation of an empirically supported worry-based treatment for persecutory delusions was accomplished by comprehensive conceptualization and integration of how systemic racism and minoritization drive the prevalence and perception of threats. This contrasts with conceptualizing racism-related hypervigilance and cognitions as worry or ignoring these critical experiences altogether, which is invalidating and neglects optimal identification and intervention on behavioral targets. Using a validating and normalizing approach, the individual was able to identify how frequent threats related to systemic racism resulted in increased worry, vigilance, and distress. By identifying and intervening on the perception of threat and associated worry, the individual engaged in more helpful responses to the threat, which in turn increased participation in more meaningful activities and reduced worry and clinical paranoia. This case illustrates how accurate conceptualization clarifies behavioral targets and increases patient engagement, which together enhance the effectiveness of the intervention for minoritized individuals.","PeriodicalId":46059,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Case Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Case Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15346501231190920","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While everyone experiences threats, some threats are culturally specific and not universally recognized or addressed by providers. A prominent example is threat-based worry and hypervigilance in Black Americans and other minoritized individuals, which is higher due to systemic racism and increases risk for psychopathology like clinically significant paranoia. To date, there have been no adaptations of cognitive-behavioral therapies for Black Americans with psychosis, despite the long-standing history of systemic racism in the United States, and its increasingly recognized contribution to psychotic experiences. Accordingly, we present the first step towards developing an adapted cognitive-behavioral intervention for Black and minoritized Americans with psychosis. This adaptation of an empirically supported worry-based treatment for persecutory delusions was accomplished by comprehensive conceptualization and integration of how systemic racism and minoritization drive the prevalence and perception of threats. This contrasts with conceptualizing racism-related hypervigilance and cognitions as worry or ignoring these critical experiences altogether, which is invalidating and neglects optimal identification and intervention on behavioral targets. Using a validating and normalizing approach, the individual was able to identify how frequent threats related to systemic racism resulted in increased worry, vigilance, and distress. By identifying and intervening on the perception of threat and associated worry, the individual engaged in more helpful responses to the threat, which in turn increased participation in more meaningful activities and reduced worry and clinical paranoia. This case illustrates how accurate conceptualization clarifies behavioral targets and increases patient engagement, which together enhance the effectiveness of the intervention for minoritized individuals.
解开系统性种族主义和临床偏执的后果以提高认知行为干预对未成年个体顽固性妄想的有效性:一个案例
虽然每个人都经历过威胁,但有些威胁是特定于文化的,并没有得到提供商的普遍认可或解决。一个突出的例子是美国黑人和其他少数群体基于威胁的担忧和过度警惕,由于系统性的种族主义,这种担忧和过度警惕更高,并增加了精神病理(如临床显著的偏执)的风险。到目前为止,还没有针对美国黑人精神病患者的认知行为疗法,尽管美国长期存在系统性的种族主义,而且人们越来越认识到种族主义对精神病经历的影响。因此,我们提出了为患有精神病的黑人和少数族裔美国人开发适应性认知行为干预的第一步。这种对经验支持的基于担忧的迫害妄想治疗的适应是通过对系统性种族主义和少数民族化如何推动威胁的流行和感知的全面概念化和整合来完成的。这与将种族主义相关的过度警惕和认知概念化为担忧或完全忽视这些关键经验形成对比,这是无效的,忽视了对行为目标的最佳识别和干预。通过验证和正常化的方法,个体能够识别出与系统性种族主义相关的频繁威胁如何导致担忧、警惕和痛苦的增加。通过识别和干预对威胁和相关担忧的感知,个体对威胁做出了更有益的反应,这反过来又增加了对更有意义的活动的参与,减少了担忧和临床偏执。这个案例说明了准确的概念化如何澄清行为目标和增加患者参与,这些共同提高了对少数群体个体的干预的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Clinical Case Studies seeks manuscripts that articulate various theoretical frameworks. All manuscripts will require an abstract and must adhere to the following format: (1) Theoretical and Research Basis, (2) Case Introduction, (3) Presenting Complaints, (4) History, (5) Assessment, (6) Case Conceptualization (this is where the clinician"s thinking and treatment selection come to the forefront), (7) Course of Treatment and Assessment of Progress, (8) Complicating Factors (including medical management), (9) Managed Care Considerations (if any), (10) Follow-up (how and how long), (11) Treatment Implications of the Case, (12) Recommendations to Clinicians and Students, and References.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信