Supplier selection by integrated IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS Method: A case study of automotive supply industry

Q1 Decision Sciences
Ramazan Eyüp Gergi̇n, Iskender Peker, A. Kısa
{"title":"Supplier selection by integrated IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS Method: A case study of automotive supply industry","authors":"Ramazan Eyüp Gergi̇n, Iskender Peker, A. Kısa","doi":"10.31181/dmame211221075g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting the best supplier emerges as a crucial subject for all sectors to achieve long term collaborations in supply chains. This study object to select the most suitable supplier for a company engage in activities in the automotive supply industry. For this purpose, a five-stage Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (IFMCDM) model is conducted. Firstly, decision criteria are defined by literature research and expert group opinions. Secondly, the importance weights of these criteria are obtained by IF Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (IFDEMATEL). Followingly, the most suitable supplier is assessed by IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS). In the fourth stage, Sensitivity Analysis is utilized to analyze the effect of differentiation in criterion. Lastly, a comparative analysis is carried out. The results of the study has pointed that “Price” is the most important criterion in supplier selection and “Supplier 4” is the best alternative for this case. Main contribution of this study is to integrate IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS method for the first time in automotive supplier selection literature and propose a specific decision framework. In addition, proposed model is found robust and valid.","PeriodicalId":32695,"journal":{"name":"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame211221075g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Selecting the best supplier emerges as a crucial subject for all sectors to achieve long term collaborations in supply chains. This study object to select the most suitable supplier for a company engage in activities in the automotive supply industry. For this purpose, a five-stage Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (IFMCDM) model is conducted. Firstly, decision criteria are defined by literature research and expert group opinions. Secondly, the importance weights of these criteria are obtained by IF Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (IFDEMATEL). Followingly, the most suitable supplier is assessed by IF Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (IFTOPSIS). In the fourth stage, Sensitivity Analysis is utilized to analyze the effect of differentiation in criterion. Lastly, a comparative analysis is carried out. The results of the study has pointed that “Price” is the most important criterion in supplier selection and “Supplier 4” is the best alternative for this case. Main contribution of this study is to integrate IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS method for the first time in automotive supplier selection literature and propose a specific decision framework. In addition, proposed model is found robust and valid.
基于IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS集成方法的供应商选择——以汽车供应行业为例
选择最佳供应商成为所有部门在供应链中实现长期合作的关键问题。本研究的目的是为一家从事汽车供应行业活动的公司选择最合适的供应商。为此,建立了一个五阶段直觉模糊多准则决策模型。首先,通过文献研究和专家组意见确定决策标准。其次,通过中频决策试验与评估实验室(IFDEMATEL)获得这些准则的重要权重。然后,利用IFTOPSIS (Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)评价最合适的供应商。第四阶段,采用敏感性分析方法,分析判据中分化的效果。最后,进行了对比分析。研究结果表明,“价格”是供应商选择的最重要标准,“供应商4”是本案例的最佳选择。本研究的主要贡献在于首次将IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS方法整合到汽车供应商选择文献中,并提出了具体的决策框架。此外,该模型具有良好的鲁棒性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering
Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering Decision Sciences-General Decision Sciences
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信