Interpreting sustainability and resilience in the built environment

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Elisabeth C. Marlow, Ksenia Chmutina, A. Dainty
{"title":"Interpreting sustainability and resilience in the built environment","authors":"Elisabeth C. Marlow, Ksenia Chmutina, A. Dainty","doi":"10.1108/ijdrbe-07-2021-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nConceptual interpretations of sustainability and resilience are widening with discursive use and altering the relationship and understanding of both concepts. By using three city case studies in the USA, this paper aims to consider which conceptual interpretations are operational and what is being measured in the context of city policy, municipal planning and built environment practice. With increasing pressures of urbanisation, it is imperative to consider which conceptual interpretations of resilience and sustainability are being measured in frameworks for the built environment if Risk-Informed Sustainable Development across multiple sectors is to be delivered.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThree case studies with semi-structured interviews have been thematically analysed to explore how sustainability and resilience have been operationalised at policy, planning and practice levels.\n\n\nFindings\nCity policies, municipal planning and practitioners are working with different interpretations. Collectively Risk Informed Sustainable Development is not formally recognised. Policies recognise GHG reductions and natural hazard events; planning guidance stipulates Environmental Impact Assessments based on legal requirements; and practitioners consider passive-survivability and systematic thinking. Across the sectors, the Leadership in Environmental and Energy Assessment Method provides a common foundation but is used with varying requirements.\n\n\nPractical implications\nDecision-makers should incorporate risk-informed sustainable development, update codes of practice and legal requirements leading to exemplary practice becoming normalised.\n\n\nSocial implications\nPassive-survivability should be affordable and adopt risk-informed sustainable development principles.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThree US city case studies with data collected from interviews have been analysed simultaneously at policy, planning and practice levels. Interrelated implications have been outlined on how to improve decision-making of sustainability and resilience across sectors.\n","PeriodicalId":45983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-07-2021-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Conceptual interpretations of sustainability and resilience are widening with discursive use and altering the relationship and understanding of both concepts. By using three city case studies in the USA, this paper aims to consider which conceptual interpretations are operational and what is being measured in the context of city policy, municipal planning and built environment practice. With increasing pressures of urbanisation, it is imperative to consider which conceptual interpretations of resilience and sustainability are being measured in frameworks for the built environment if Risk-Informed Sustainable Development across multiple sectors is to be delivered. Design/methodology/approach Three case studies with semi-structured interviews have been thematically analysed to explore how sustainability and resilience have been operationalised at policy, planning and practice levels. Findings City policies, municipal planning and practitioners are working with different interpretations. Collectively Risk Informed Sustainable Development is not formally recognised. Policies recognise GHG reductions and natural hazard events; planning guidance stipulates Environmental Impact Assessments based on legal requirements; and practitioners consider passive-survivability and systematic thinking. Across the sectors, the Leadership in Environmental and Energy Assessment Method provides a common foundation but is used with varying requirements. Practical implications Decision-makers should incorporate risk-informed sustainable development, update codes of practice and legal requirements leading to exemplary practice becoming normalised. Social implications Passive-survivability should be affordable and adopt risk-informed sustainable development principles. Originality/value Three US city case studies with data collected from interviews have been analysed simultaneously at policy, planning and practice levels. Interrelated implications have been outlined on how to improve decision-making of sustainability and resilience across sectors.
解读建筑环境中的可持续性和弹性
随着话语的使用,可持续性和弹性的概念解释正在扩大,并改变了这两个概念的关系和理解。通过使用美国的三个城市案例研究,本文旨在考虑哪些概念解释是可操作的,以及在城市政策、市政规划和建筑环境实践的背景下正在衡量什么。随着城市化压力的增加,如果要实现跨多个部门的风险知情可持续发展,就必须考虑在建筑环境框架中衡量弹性和可持续性的概念解释。设计/方法/方法三个半结构化访谈的案例研究进行了主题分析,以探讨如何在政策、规划和实践层面上实施可持续性和弹性。城市政策、市政规划和从业人员都有不同的解释。集体风险知情的可持续发展没有得到正式承认。政策承认温室气体减排和自然灾害事件;规划指引规定根据法律要求进行环境影响评估;从业者考虑被动生存能力和系统思维。在各个部门中,环境和能源领导评估方法提供了一个共同的基础,但用于不同的要求。实际影响决策者应纳入风险知情的可持续发展,更新业务守则和法律要求,从而使示范实践成为常态。社会影响被动生存能力应该是负担得起的,并采用风险知情的可持续发展原则。原创性/价值三个美国城市案例研究从访谈中收集数据,同时在政策、规划和实践层面进行分析。概述了如何改进各部门可持续性和复原力决策的相关影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信