Love in Precarious Times: A Queer Politics of Immigration

IF 2.1 4区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES
Ariana Ochoa Camacho, K. Coll
{"title":"Love in Precarious Times: A Queer Politics of Immigration","authors":"Ariana Ochoa Camacho, K. Coll","doi":"10.1353/fro.2021.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Increased media coverage of the human costs of border enforcement, especially the detention of children and the separation of families, has called attention to structural violence and inhumanity in the US immigration system. An estimated eleven million undocumented people and millions more members of mixed-status families have lived for years with the trauma caused by legal exclusion, economic precarity, and separation from loved ones. Yet years of legislative reform efforts and rights claims based on heteronormative notions of immigrant respectability, family unity, and economic contributions have failed to yield better policies. This article describes a turn within the immigrant rights movement in the 2010s toward a more transformative politics of radical inclusion across, not in spite of, differences in sexuality, gender, race, citizenship, and immigration status. Citing examples from immigrant public testimonies, movement publications, LISTSERVs, and social media, we argue that they offer evidence of new, durable bonds of political interdependence being forged between unusual allies in the struggle against racist and homo/transphobic state violence that we describe as a queer politics. The gains of the marriage equality movement, especially shifting cultural acceptance of same-sex love, support immigrant organizing across and beyond the constraints of strategic alliances, coalitions, and hierarchies of deservingness. Practices of loving politics, particularly in the current context, offer resources for hope for a stronger and more durable political consensus about what constitutes immigrant justice in the future.","PeriodicalId":46007,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"110 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers-A Journal of Women Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2021.0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Increased media coverage of the human costs of border enforcement, especially the detention of children and the separation of families, has called attention to structural violence and inhumanity in the US immigration system. An estimated eleven million undocumented people and millions more members of mixed-status families have lived for years with the trauma caused by legal exclusion, economic precarity, and separation from loved ones. Yet years of legislative reform efforts and rights claims based on heteronormative notions of immigrant respectability, family unity, and economic contributions have failed to yield better policies. This article describes a turn within the immigrant rights movement in the 2010s toward a more transformative politics of radical inclusion across, not in spite of, differences in sexuality, gender, race, citizenship, and immigration status. Citing examples from immigrant public testimonies, movement publications, LISTSERVs, and social media, we argue that they offer evidence of new, durable bonds of political interdependence being forged between unusual allies in the struggle against racist and homo/transphobic state violence that we describe as a queer politics. The gains of the marriage equality movement, especially shifting cultural acceptance of same-sex love, support immigrant organizing across and beyond the constraints of strategic alliances, coalitions, and hierarchies of deservingness. Practices of loving politics, particularly in the current context, offer resources for hope for a stronger and more durable political consensus about what constitutes immigrant justice in the future.
危险时代的爱情:移民的古怪政治
摘要:媒体越来越多地报道边境执法的人力成本,特别是拘留儿童和家庭分离,这引起了人们对美国移民系统中结构性暴力和不人道行为的关注。据估计,有1100万无证人员和数百万混合身份家庭成员多年来一直生活在法律排斥、经济不稳定和与亲人分离造成的创伤中。然而,多年的立法改革努力和基于移民体面、家庭团结和经济贡献等非规范概念的权利主张未能产生更好的政策。这篇文章描述了2010年代移民权利运动内部的一个转变,即在性、性别、种族、公民身份和移民身份方面,而不是尽管存在差异,但朝着更具变革性的激进包容政治转变。引用移民公开证词、运动出版物、LISTSERV和社交媒体的例子,我们认为,它们提供了证据,证明在反对种族主义和恐同/恐跨性别国家暴力的斗争中,不同寻常的盟友之间正在建立新的、持久的政治相互依存关系,我们将其描述为一种酷儿政治。婚姻平等运动的成果,特别是对同性爱情的文化接受的转变,支持移民组织超越战略联盟、联盟和等级制度的限制。热爱政治的实践,特别是在当前背景下,为未来就什么构成移民正义达成更强有力、更持久的政治共识提供了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信