To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean's Summertime (1955)

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Alison L. Mckee
{"title":"To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean's Summertime (1955)","authors":"Alison L. Mckee","doi":"10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"in 2011 melanie notkin, a contributor to the online site HuffPost, wrote an opinion piece titled “Is ‘Career Woman’ the New ‘Spinster’?” In it she recounts a conversation with a man who explained her singleness (more to himself than to her) as a function of her being a career woman. “Why are we ‘career women’ but you’re just a guy who hasn’t been lucky in love?” she asks him. “I’m not a ‘career woman,’” she declares. “I’m looking for love.” Surprising (and somewhat depressing) for its implicit recapitulation of the stereotype of the lonely career woman whose occupation is a poor substitute for a man, the title of Notkin’s brief op-ed nevertheless anticipates the recent trend to rehabilitate the term “spinster” and repurpose it for feminist studies and post-feminism. Kate Bolick’s Spinster: Making a Life of One’s Own (2015), an examination of her own and other women’s single lives, made The New York Times best-seller list, and Briallen Hopper’s Hard to Love: Essays and Confessions (2019) explores and reclaims the spinster in ways that demolish heterosexual romance and marriage as the standard by which women lead and assess their lives. That the term’s negative connotations of dowdiness, lack of sexual appeal, and illegitimacy as a woman persist into the twenty-first century is due in no small measure to the role that classical Hollywood film in particular played in perpetuating these stereotypes in the popular imagination. Yet as this examination of David Lean’s 1955 film Summertime suggests, as a kind of test case, some mid-century spinster narratives contain within them the seeds of their own reclamation, particularly when watched anew from the vantage point of the twenty-first century. Informed by a history of the film’s production and reception, yet also enabled by current-day digital viewing practices, this case study asserts that multiple gazes in and at Summertime dovetail with Katharine Hepburn star discourses to produce a possessive feminist spectator more than sixty-five years after the film’s original release. A present-day viewing of the under-studied Summertime with new media technologies leads to modes of meaning production in the course of the film’s consumption in ways that have not been previously explored in earlier spinster narratives or in classical Hollywood cinema generally, and it is these dynamics that this case study ultimately explores. Film theorist Laura Mulvey has dubbed cinema “death 24x a times a second,” a reference to the standard projection speed of twenty-four To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean’s Summertime (1955)","PeriodicalId":43116,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","volume":"73 1","pages":"26 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/JFILMVIDEO.73.2.0026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

in 2011 melanie notkin, a contributor to the online site HuffPost, wrote an opinion piece titled “Is ‘Career Woman’ the New ‘Spinster’?” In it she recounts a conversation with a man who explained her singleness (more to himself than to her) as a function of her being a career woman. “Why are we ‘career women’ but you’re just a guy who hasn’t been lucky in love?” she asks him. “I’m not a ‘career woman,’” she declares. “I’m looking for love.” Surprising (and somewhat depressing) for its implicit recapitulation of the stereotype of the lonely career woman whose occupation is a poor substitute for a man, the title of Notkin’s brief op-ed nevertheless anticipates the recent trend to rehabilitate the term “spinster” and repurpose it for feminist studies and post-feminism. Kate Bolick’s Spinster: Making a Life of One’s Own (2015), an examination of her own and other women’s single lives, made The New York Times best-seller list, and Briallen Hopper’s Hard to Love: Essays and Confessions (2019) explores and reclaims the spinster in ways that demolish heterosexual romance and marriage as the standard by which women lead and assess their lives. That the term’s negative connotations of dowdiness, lack of sexual appeal, and illegitimacy as a woman persist into the twenty-first century is due in no small measure to the role that classical Hollywood film in particular played in perpetuating these stereotypes in the popular imagination. Yet as this examination of David Lean’s 1955 film Summertime suggests, as a kind of test case, some mid-century spinster narratives contain within them the seeds of their own reclamation, particularly when watched anew from the vantage point of the twenty-first century. Informed by a history of the film’s production and reception, yet also enabled by current-day digital viewing practices, this case study asserts that multiple gazes in and at Summertime dovetail with Katharine Hepburn star discourses to produce a possessive feminist spectator more than sixty-five years after the film’s original release. A present-day viewing of the under-studied Summertime with new media technologies leads to modes of meaning production in the course of the film’s consumption in ways that have not been previously explored in earlier spinster narratives or in classical Hollywood cinema generally, and it is these dynamics that this case study ultimately explores. Film theorist Laura Mulvey has dubbed cinema “death 24x a times a second,” a reference to the standard projection speed of twenty-four To Have and to Hold: The Possessive Spectator, the Spinster Narrative, and Katharine Hepburn in David Lean’s Summertime (1955)
拥有和持有:《占有的旁观者》、《旋转叙事》和《大卫·莱恩的夏天》中的凯瑟琳·赫本(1955)
2011年,在线网站《赫芬顿邮报》的撰稿人melanie notkin写了一篇题为《“职业女性”是新的“旋转者”吗。她问他:“为什么我们是‘职业女性’,而你只是一个在爱情中运气不佳的人?”。“我不是一个‘职业女性’,”她宣称。“我在寻找爱。”令人惊讶(也有点沮丧)的是,诺特金的简短专栏文章的标题含蓄地重述了孤独职业女性的刻板印象,她的职业很难替代男性。然而,它预见到了最近的趋势,即恢复“老处女”一词,并将其重新用于女权主义研究和后女权主义。凯特·博利克(Kate Bolick)的《Spinster:Making a Life of One’s Own》(2015)对她自己和其他女性的单身生活进行了审视,并登上了《纽约时报》畅销书排行榜,布里艾伦·霍珀(Briallen Hopper)的《难以爱:随笔与自白》(2019)以打破异性恋浪漫和婚姻作为女性领导和评估生活标准的方式,探索并重新审视了这位年轻人。这个词对邋遢、缺乏性吸引力和女性非法性的负面含义一直持续到21世纪,这在很大程度上要归功于经典好莱坞电影在大众想象中延续这些刻板印象方面所扮演的角色。然而,正如对大卫·利恩1955年电影《夏日时光》的研究所表明的那样,作为一种测试案例,一些世纪中期的老处女叙事中包含了他们自己开垦的种子,尤其是当从21世纪的有利位置重新观看时。这项案例研究了解了这部电影的制作和接受历史,但也得益于当今的数字观看实践,它断言,在电影最初上映六十五年多后,在夏季和夏季的多次凝视与凯瑟琳·赫本的明星话语相吻合,产生了一种占有欲强的女权主义观众。如今,用新媒体技术观看研究不足的《夏日》,会在电影消费过程中产生意义生产模式,这种模式在早期的老处女叙事或传统好莱坞电影中都没有被探索过,而本案例研究最终探索的正是这些动态。电影理论家劳拉·马尔维(Laura Mulvey)将电影称为“每秒24倍的死亡”,指的是大卫·莱恩(David Lean)的《夏日》(Summertime)(1955年)中24小时的标准放映速度:《占有的旁观者》(the Possession Spectator)、《旋转叙事》(Spinster Narrative)和凯瑟琳·赫本(Katharine Hepburn)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO
JOURNAL OF FILM AND VIDEO FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Film and Video, an internationally respected forum, focuses on scholarship in the fields of film and video production, history, theory, criticism, and aesthetics. Article features include film and related media, problems of education in these fields, and the function of film and video in society. The Journal does not ascribe to any specific method but expects articles to shed light on the views and teaching of the production and study of film and video.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信