The Effect of Logbook on the Clinical Training Aspects of Oral Medicine from the Perspective of Students and Faculties of Ahvaz School of Dentistry

Fatemeh Babadi, M. Shooriabi, Hamed Saberikia, M. Cheraghi
{"title":"The Effect of Logbook on the Clinical Training Aspects of Oral Medicine from the Perspective of Students and Faculties of Ahvaz School of Dentistry","authors":"Fatemeh Babadi, M. Shooriabi, Hamed Saberikia, M. Cheraghi","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2020.47864.1326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Assessment of student clinical performance is one of the most difficult tasks of faculty members. Logbook is one of the most effective methods for educational assessment. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of logbook from the viewpoints of Ahvaz dental students and faculty members of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial medicine. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted on the 70 students and six faculty members of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial medicine, School of Dental Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. The questionnaire was prepared from previous studies and included four areas of necessity, quality, format, and implementation process and how to complete the logbook. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis, independent t-test, and SPSS ver.18. Results: The viewpoint of faculty members regarding the four features of logbook and the overall view of the logbook was more than the students. However, no significant difference was found between the viewpoint of students and faculty members. 50.7% of the students and more than 50% of the faculties considered the use of the logbook necessary to ensure consistent educational standards in clinical training. They also showed that the logbook meets all 50% of the educational standards both in format and implementation process. Conclusion: Faculty members and students showed a positive view of logbook, but positive overall view of the faculty members was more than the students. Therefore, reviewing the logbook is not necessary, but more familiarity with the logbook content seems necessary.","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2020.47864.1326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment of student clinical performance is one of the most difficult tasks of faculty members. Logbook is one of the most effective methods for educational assessment. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of logbook from the viewpoints of Ahvaz dental students and faculty members of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial medicine. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted on the 70 students and six faculty members of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial medicine, School of Dental Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. The questionnaire was prepared from previous studies and included four areas of necessity, quality, format, and implementation process and how to complete the logbook. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis, independent t-test, and SPSS ver.18. Results: The viewpoint of faculty members regarding the four features of logbook and the overall view of the logbook was more than the students. However, no significant difference was found between the viewpoint of students and faculty members. 50.7% of the students and more than 50% of the faculties considered the use of the logbook necessary to ensure consistent educational standards in clinical training. They also showed that the logbook meets all 50% of the educational standards both in format and implementation process. Conclusion: Faculty members and students showed a positive view of logbook, but positive overall view of the faculty members was more than the students. Therefore, reviewing the logbook is not necessary, but more familiarity with the logbook content seems necessary.
从Ahvaz牙科学院的学生和学院看航海日志对口腔医学临床训练的影响
引言:评估学生的临床表现是教职工最困难的任务之一。日志是最有效的教育评估方法之一。本研究的目的是从Ahvaz牙科学生和口腔颌面医学系教员的角度评估航海日志的疗效。方法:对Ahvaz Jundishapur医科大学口腔医学院口腔颌面医学系的70名学生和6名教职员工进行横断面研究。该问卷是根据以前的研究编制的,包括四个领域:必要性、质量、格式、实施过程以及如何完成日志。使用描述性统计分析、独立t检验和SPSS 18版对数据进行分析。结果:教职工对航海日志的四个特点和航海日志的整体看法的看法多于学生。然而,学生和教职员工的观点没有发现显著差异。50.7%的学生和50%以上的教师认为使用航海日志是确保临床培训教育标准一致的必要条件。他们还表明,航海日志在格式和实施过程中都符合50%的教育标准。结论:教职工和学生对航海日志有积极的看法,但教职工对航海日志的总体积极看法多于学生。因此,复习航海日志是不必要的,但更熟悉航海日志的内容似乎是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信