Control of the white mango scale Aulacaspis tubercularis (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Diaspididae) with systemic soil drenching insecticides and pruning in greater than ten years old mangos in western Ethiopia

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Belay Habtegebriel, Dawit Melisie, Hunde Kidane, Teshale Daba, Ferdu Azerefegn
{"title":"Control of the white mango scale Aulacaspis tubercularis (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Diaspididae) with systemic soil drenching insecticides and pruning in greater than ten years old mangos in western Ethiopia","authors":"Belay Habtegebriel, Dawit Melisie, Hunde Kidane, Teshale Daba, Ferdu Azerefegn","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3987792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The white mango scale insect (WMS), Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead, 1906 is a key pest of mango in Ethiopia, which has been spreading throughout the country since its introduction in 2010. Evaluation of the efficacy of two systemic soil drenching insecticides (thiamethoxam 25 % WG and imidacloprid 35 % SC) independently, and in combination with tree management (pruning) for the cont­rol of the WMS was conducted under field conditions in western Ethiopia in two locations in 2018 and 2019. Randomized complete block designs with three replications were used for the experiments. In the first site, all treatments resulted in scale populations that were significantly lower than the control (1086 crawlers and females per leaf). Thiamethoxam 25 % WG at 12 g/tree + pruning resulted in the lowest number of the WMS after the second treatment (43.5 per leaf) followed by thiamethoxam 25 % WG at 18 g/tree + pruning, which was statistically similar. In the second site, imidacloprid 35 % SC + thiamethoxam 25 % WG at 18 g/tree + pruning, resulted in the lowest mean number of the WMS (31.1 per leaf) followed by thiamethoxam 25 % WG at 12 g/tree + pruning (61.4 per leaf). This treatment also gave the highest percentage reduction in number of the WMS compared to the WMS counting before treatment application. This study has shown that use of systemic insecticides and pruning are promising control tactics for the WMS. Cost implications and effects of the insecticides on the natural enemy complex and residual toxicity in fruits need to be evaluated.\nTo cite: Belay Habtegebriel, Dawit Melisie, Hunde Kidane, Teshale Daba & Ferdu Azerefegn. 2020. Control of the white mango scale Aulacaspis tubercularis (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Diaspididae) with systemic soil drenching insecticides and pruning in greater than ten years old mangos in western Ethiopia. Israel Journal of Entomology 50(1): 65–73. \nhttp://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3987792http://zoobank.org/References/8FA7BF70-B678-420B-9E11-3D87C8F16C76","PeriodicalId":38793,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Entomology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3987792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The white mango scale insect (WMS), Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead, 1906 is a key pest of mango in Ethiopia, which has been spreading throughout the country since its introduction in 2010. Evaluation of the efficacy of two systemic soil drenching insecticides (thiamethoxam 25 % WG and imidacloprid 35 % SC) independently, and in combination with tree management (pruning) for the cont­rol of the WMS was conducted under field conditions in western Ethiopia in two locations in 2018 and 2019. Randomized complete block designs with three replications were used for the experiments. In the first site, all treatments resulted in scale populations that were significantly lower than the control (1086 crawlers and females per leaf). Thiamethoxam 25 % WG at 12 g/tree + pruning resulted in the lowest number of the WMS after the second treatment (43.5 per leaf) followed by thiamethoxam 25 % WG at 18 g/tree + pruning, which was statistically similar. In the second site, imidacloprid 35 % SC + thiamethoxam 25 % WG at 18 g/tree + pruning, resulted in the lowest mean number of the WMS (31.1 per leaf) followed by thiamethoxam 25 % WG at 12 g/tree + pruning (61.4 per leaf). This treatment also gave the highest percentage reduction in number of the WMS compared to the WMS counting before treatment application. This study has shown that use of systemic insecticides and pruning are promising control tactics for the WMS. Cost implications and effects of the insecticides on the natural enemy complex and residual toxicity in fruits need to be evaluated. To cite: Belay Habtegebriel, Dawit Melisie, Hunde Kidane, Teshale Daba & Ferdu Azerefegn. 2020. Control of the white mango scale Aulacaspis tubercularis (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Diaspididae) with systemic soil drenching insecticides and pruning in greater than ten years old mangos in western Ethiopia. Israel Journal of Entomology 50(1): 65–73.  http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3987792http://zoobank.org/References/8FA7BF70-B678-420B-9E11-3D87C8F16C76
埃塞俄比亚西部10年以上树龄的芒果用系统土壤喷洒杀虫剂和修剪技术防治白芒果鳞结核小蠊(半翅目:小蠊科:小蠊科)
白色芒果介壳虫(WMS),Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead,1906,是埃塞俄比亚芒果的一种主要害虫,自2010年引入以来一直在全国传播。两种系统性土壤淋湿杀虫剂(噻虫嗪25)的药效评价 % WG和吡虫啉35 % SC),并结合树木管理(修剪),于2018年和2019年在埃塞俄比亚西部的两个地点进行了WMS控制。实验采用三次重复的随机完全块设计。在第一个地点,所有处理都产生了明显低于对照的鳞片种群(每片叶子1086只爬虫和雌性)。噻虫嗪25 % 12克/棵的WG+修剪导致第二次处理后WMS数量最低(43.5片/叶),其次是噻虫嗪25 % WG为18g/棵树+修剪,这在统计学上是相似的。在第二个地点,吡虫啉35 % SC+噻虫嗪25 % 18克/棵的WG+修剪,导致WMS的平均数量最低(每片叶子31.1个),其次是噻虫嗪25 % WG为12 g/棵树+修剪(每片叶子61.4)。与治疗前的WMS计数相比,这种治疗也使WMS的数量减少了最高的百分比。这项研究表明,使用系统杀虫剂和修剪是WMS有前景的控制策略。需要评估杀虫剂对天敌复合体的成本影响和影响,以及水果中的残留毒性。引用:Belay Habtegebriel、Dawit Melie、Hunde Kidane、Teshale Daba和Ferdu Azerefegn。2020.在埃塞俄比亚西部,用系统土壤喷洒杀虫剂和修剪10年以上树龄的芒果,控制白芒果鳞结核小蠊(半翅目:小蠊科:小蠊科)。以色列昆虫学杂志50(1):65-73http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3987792http://zoobank.org/References/8FA7BF70-B678-420B-9E11-3D87C8F16C76
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Israel Journal of Entomology
Israel Journal of Entomology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信