Analysis of Recurrent Events with Associated Informative Censoring: Application to HIV Data

Jonathan Ejoku, C. Odhiambo, Linda Chaba
{"title":"Analysis of Recurrent Events with Associated Informative Censoring: Application to HIV Data","authors":"Jonathan Ejoku, C. Odhiambo, Linda Chaba","doi":"10.6000/1929-6029.2020.09.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we adapt a Cox-based model for recurrent events; the Prentice, Williams and Peterson Total -Time (PWP-TT) that has largely, been used under the assumption of non-informative censoring and evaluate it under an informative censoring setting. Empirical evaluation was undertaken with the aid of the semi-parametric framework for recurrent events suggested by Huang [1] and implemented in R Studio software. For validation we used data from a typical HIV care setting in Kenya. Of the three models under consideration; the standard Cox Model had gender hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (p-value=0.165), Andersen-Gill had HR 0.46 (with borderline p-value=0.054) and extended PWP TT had HR 0.22 (p-value=0.006). The PWP-TT model performed better as compared to other models under informative setting. In terms of risk factors under informative setting, LTFU due to stigma; gender [base=Male] had HR 0.544 (p-value =0.002), age [base is < 37] had HR 0.772 (p-value=0.008), ART regimen [base= First line] had HR 0.518 (p-value= 0.233) and differentiated care model (Base=not on DCM) had HR 0.77(p-value=0.036). In conclusion, in spite of the multiple interventions designed to address incidences of LTFU among HIV patients, within-person cases of LTFU are usually common and recurrent in nature, with the present likelihood of a person getting LTFU influenced by previous occurrences and therefore informative censoring should be checked.","PeriodicalId":73480,"journal":{"name":"International journal of statistics in medical research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of statistics in medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2020.09.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this study, we adapt a Cox-based model for recurrent events; the Prentice, Williams and Peterson Total -Time (PWP-TT) that has largely, been used under the assumption of non-informative censoring and evaluate it under an informative censoring setting. Empirical evaluation was undertaken with the aid of the semi-parametric framework for recurrent events suggested by Huang [1] and implemented in R Studio software. For validation we used data from a typical HIV care setting in Kenya. Of the three models under consideration; the standard Cox Model had gender hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (p-value=0.165), Andersen-Gill had HR 0.46 (with borderline p-value=0.054) and extended PWP TT had HR 0.22 (p-value=0.006). The PWP-TT model performed better as compared to other models under informative setting. In terms of risk factors under informative setting, LTFU due to stigma; gender [base=Male] had HR 0.544 (p-value =0.002), age [base is < 37] had HR 0.772 (p-value=0.008), ART regimen [base= First line] had HR 0.518 (p-value= 0.233) and differentiated care model (Base=not on DCM) had HR 0.77(p-value=0.036). In conclusion, in spite of the multiple interventions designed to address incidences of LTFU among HIV patients, within-person cases of LTFU are usually common and recurrent in nature, with the present likelihood of a person getting LTFU influenced by previous occurrences and therefore informative censoring should be checked.
反复事件与相关信息审查的分析:在HIV数据中的应用
在这项研究中,我们采用基于cox的模型来研究复发事件;普伦蒂斯,威廉姆斯和彼得森总时间(PWP-TT),主要是在非信息审查假设下使用的,并在信息审查设置下对其进行评估。借助于Huang[1]提出的循环事件半参数框架进行实证评估,并在R Studio软件中实现。为了验证,我们使用了肯尼亚一个典型的艾滋病护理机构的数据。在审议中的三种模式中;标准Cox模型的性别风险比(HR)为0.66 (p值=0.165),Andersen-Gill模型的HR为0.46(临界p值=0.054),扩展PWP TT的HR为0.22 (p值=0.006)。与其他模型相比,PWP-TT模型在信息设置下表现更好。在信息环境下的风险因素方面,LTFU是由于耻辱;性别[基数=男性]的HR为0.544 (p值=0.002),年龄[基数< 37]的HR为0.772 (p值=0.008),ART方案[基数=一线]的HR为0.518 (p值= 0.233),差异化护理模式(基数=非DCM)的HR为0.77(p值=0.036)。总之,尽管有多种干预措施旨在解决艾滋病毒患者中LTFU的发生率,但LTFU的个人病例通常是常见的和复发性的,目前一个人获得LTFU的可能性受到先前事件的影响,因此应检查信息审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信