Effect of Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI) Biofeedback on Improving Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Individuals With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review
Jennifer A. LaCross, Laurel Proulx, Kelli J Brizzolara, J. Humphrey
{"title":"Effect of Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging (RUSI) Biofeedback on Improving Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Individuals With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review","authors":"Jennifer A. LaCross, Laurel Proulx, Kelli J Brizzolara, J. Humphrey","doi":"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pelvic floor muscle training is a common intervention for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). One method utilized to augment muscle training is biofeedback. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) is a noninvasive biofeedback tool. Objectives: The purpose of this review was to determine the effect of RUSI on pelvic floor muscle function, quality of life, volume of urinary leakage, and severity of urinary leakage in females and males with urinary incontinence and, when possible, compare these results to those of other biofeedback interventions. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE were searched for titles from peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings from January 2010 to May 2020. An updated search was performed in January 2021. Inclusion criteria included studies with participants 18 years or older with urinary incontinence. The primary experimental intervention was transabdominal or transperineal RUSI. Results: Nine studies were included in this review. The ability to correctly contract the pelvic floor was achieved by more than 95% of participants following RUSI biofeedback training. Although outcomes were not consistently reported, RUSI intervention resulted in a decrease in incontinence severity and number of incontinence episodes per week, as well as improved pelvic floor strength, self-rating of improvement, task-specific self-efficacy, and quality of life. Conclusion: The results of this review provide moderate evidence to support the use of RUSI biofeedback via a transabdominal or transperineal approach in males and females with SUI to improve motor performance of the pelvic floor.","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":"45 1","pages":"174 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Pelvic floor muscle training is a common intervention for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). One method utilized to augment muscle training is biofeedback. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) is a noninvasive biofeedback tool. Objectives: The purpose of this review was to determine the effect of RUSI on pelvic floor muscle function, quality of life, volume of urinary leakage, and severity of urinary leakage in females and males with urinary incontinence and, when possible, compare these results to those of other biofeedback interventions. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE were searched for titles from peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings from January 2010 to May 2020. An updated search was performed in January 2021. Inclusion criteria included studies with participants 18 years or older with urinary incontinence. The primary experimental intervention was transabdominal or transperineal RUSI. Results: Nine studies were included in this review. The ability to correctly contract the pelvic floor was achieved by more than 95% of participants following RUSI biofeedback training. Although outcomes were not consistently reported, RUSI intervention resulted in a decrease in incontinence severity and number of incontinence episodes per week, as well as improved pelvic floor strength, self-rating of improvement, task-specific self-efficacy, and quality of life. Conclusion: The results of this review provide moderate evidence to support the use of RUSI biofeedback via a transabdominal or transperineal approach in males and females with SUI to improve motor performance of the pelvic floor.
背景:盆底肌肉训练是治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)的常见干预措施。增强肌肉训练的一种方法是生物反馈。康复超声成像(RUSI)是一种无创的生物反馈工具。目的:本综述的目的是确定入路干预对女性和男性尿失禁患者盆底肌功能、生活质量、尿漏量和尿漏严重程度的影响,并在可能的情况下将这些结果与其他生物反馈干预的结果进行比较。研究设计:系统评价。方法:检索2010年1月至2020年5月PubMed、CINAHL、Science Direct、Scopus、Web of Science和MEDLINE的同行评议期刊和会议记录。2021年1月进行了更新的搜索。纳入标准包括18岁及以上尿失禁患者的研究。主要的实验干预是经腹部或经会阴RUSI。结果:本综述纳入了9项研究。超过95%的参与者在入寺生物反馈训练后能够正确收缩骨盆底。尽管结果没有一致的报道,入寺干预导致尿失禁严重程度和每周尿失禁发作次数的减少,以及骨盆底力量、自我改善评分、任务特异性自我效能和生活质量的改善。结论:本综述的结果提供了中等程度的证据,支持通过经腹或经会阴入路在SUI男性和女性患者中使用RUSI生物反馈来改善盆底运动性能。