{"title":"“Miseries, Tribulations, and Calamities”: António de Gouveia as an Eye-witness to the Seventeenth-century Eurasian Crisis","authors":"C. Gomes, J. Cunha","doi":"10.1163/24684791-12340064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The “General Crisis of the Seventeenth-Century” as a concept was first applied to Europe, where the Portuguese Restoration of 1640 was one of its most striking episodes, when a national dynasty dethroned a foreign one. Geoffrey Parker extended its use worldwide, having in mind similar events taking place all over the globe, namely in China, where dynastic transition took centre stage. Some parallels can be drawn between the two sides of Eurasia, though sometimes in opposite terms (e.g., while the Braganzas were Portuguese, the Qing were Manchu).\n Among the coincidences occurring in both countries during dynastic changes, there is mention to omens and wondrous signs, interpreted as manifestations of something about to change, breaking away from the old established order which had lost some sort of divine assent. By using the writings of the Portuguese Jesuit António de Gouveia (1592/94–1677), namely his letters, some of which unpublished, we will seek to see how he interpreted these signs and dynastic change in China, while his own country (Portugal) was going through a similar process. We will make use of materials dating from 1636 to the 1650s, to see what kind of parallelisms Gouveia draws between the Chinese seventeenth-century crisis and the Portuguese case, and how he depicts and characterises the events occurring in China.","PeriodicalId":29854,"journal":{"name":"Ming Qing Yanjiu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ming Qing Yanjiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24684791-12340064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The “General Crisis of the Seventeenth-Century” as a concept was first applied to Europe, where the Portuguese Restoration of 1640 was one of its most striking episodes, when a national dynasty dethroned a foreign one. Geoffrey Parker extended its use worldwide, having in mind similar events taking place all over the globe, namely in China, where dynastic transition took centre stage. Some parallels can be drawn between the two sides of Eurasia, though sometimes in opposite terms (e.g., while the Braganzas were Portuguese, the Qing were Manchu).
Among the coincidences occurring in both countries during dynastic changes, there is mention to omens and wondrous signs, interpreted as manifestations of something about to change, breaking away from the old established order which had lost some sort of divine assent. By using the writings of the Portuguese Jesuit António de Gouveia (1592/94–1677), namely his letters, some of which unpublished, we will seek to see how he interpreted these signs and dynastic change in China, while his own country (Portugal) was going through a similar process. We will make use of materials dating from 1636 to the 1650s, to see what kind of parallelisms Gouveia draws between the Chinese seventeenth-century crisis and the Portuguese case, and how he depicts and characterises the events occurring in China.
“十七世纪的大危机”作为一个概念首次应用于欧洲,1640年葡萄牙复辟是欧洲最引人注目的事件之一,当时一个民族王朝废黜了一个外国王朝。杰弗里·帕克(Geoffrey Parker)将其应用范围扩展到了世界各地,考虑到全球各地都在发生类似的事件,即在中国,王朝过渡占据了中心舞台。欧亚大陆两岸之间可以有一些相似之处,尽管有时是相反的(例如,当布拉干萨人是葡萄牙人时,清朝人是满族人)。在两国王朝更迭期间发生的巧合中,有一种是预兆和奇妙的迹象,被解释为即将发生变化的事物的表现,打破了失去某种神圣认可的旧秩序。通过使用葡萄牙耶稣会士António de Gouveia(1592/94–1677)的著作,即他的信件(其中一些未发表),我们将试图了解他是如何解读这些迹象和中国的王朝变化的,而他的国家(葡萄牙)正经历着类似的过程。我们将利用1636年至1650年代的材料,看看高维亚在17世纪的中国危机和葡萄牙案件之间有什么样的相似之处,以及他如何描述和描述中国发生的事件。