DIFERENSIASI TANDA WAQAF MUSHAF STANDAR INDONESIA 2008 DAN MUSHAF MADINAH 1439 H

QOF Pub Date : 2022-06-15 DOI:10.30762/qof.v6i1.138
Lilik Lilik, Mulqi Yagiasa Ulfah
{"title":"DIFERENSIASI TANDA WAQAF MUSHAF STANDAR INDONESIA 2008 DAN MUSHAF MADINAH 1439 H","authors":"Lilik Lilik, Mulqi Yagiasa Ulfah","doi":"10.30762/qof.v6i1.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the difference between the waqf marks of the Indonesian Standard Mushaf and the Medinan Mushaf. The distinction between the two manuscripts lies in their marking and placement. It focused on the factors causing the differences and determining whether or not the effect of differences on meaning. The method used was the comparative analysis method by analyzing and comparing the two manuscripts. The object under study is QS. al-Baqarah in the 2008 Indonesian Standard Mushaf and the Medina Mushaf published by Mujammā al-Mālik Fāhd 1439 H, and corroborated by the results of interviews. The findings from this tracking were: 1) There are similarities and differences in the placement of waqf marks in the Indonesian Standard Mushaf and the Medinan Mushaf in QS. al-Baqarah. 2) The similarities in the placement of waqf signs are 143 and the difference is 456. 3) The factors that caused differences between the placement of waqaf signs in the Indonesian Standard Mushaf and the Medina Mushaf are different from understanding the editorial composition of the Qur'an in terms of Balaghah science in its three branches, namely 'Ilm al-Bayān, 'Ilm al-Ma'ānī, and 'Ilm al-Bādī’.","PeriodicalId":33702,"journal":{"name":"QOF","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QOF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30762/qof.v6i1.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the difference between the waqf marks of the Indonesian Standard Mushaf and the Medinan Mushaf. The distinction between the two manuscripts lies in their marking and placement. It focused on the factors causing the differences and determining whether or not the effect of differences on meaning. The method used was the comparative analysis method by analyzing and comparing the two manuscripts. The object under study is QS. al-Baqarah in the 2008 Indonesian Standard Mushaf and the Medina Mushaf published by Mujammā al-Mālik Fāhd 1439 H, and corroborated by the results of interviews. The findings from this tracking were: 1) There are similarities and differences in the placement of waqf marks in the Indonesian Standard Mushaf and the Medinan Mushaf in QS. al-Baqarah. 2) The similarities in the placement of waqf signs are 143 and the difference is 456. 3) The factors that caused differences between the placement of waqaf signs in the Indonesian Standard Mushaf and the Medina Mushaf are different from understanding the editorial composition of the Qur'an in terms of Balaghah science in its three branches, namely 'Ilm al-Bayān, 'Ilm al-Ma'ānī, and 'Ilm al-Bādī’.
分化标志WAQAF MUSHAF 2008和MUSHAF麦地那1439 H
本研究考察了印尼标准麝香和麦地那麝香的waqmarks之间的差异。这两份手稿的区别在于它们的标记和位置。它侧重于造成差异的因素,并确定差异是否对意义产生影响。所采用的方法是比较分析法,通过对两份手稿进行分析比较。研究的对象是QS。al-Baqarah在2008年印尼标准穆沙夫和麦地那穆沙夫出版的Mujammā al-Mālik Fāhd 1439 H,并由访谈结果证实。这一跟踪的结果是:1)在QS中印度尼西亚标准麝香和麦地那麝香的waqf标记位置有相似之处和差异。将。2) waqf标识放置的相似性为143个,差异性为456个。3)造成印尼语标准书稿和麦地那书稿中waqaf符号位置差异的因素,不同于理解《古兰经》在三个分支,即“Ilm al-Bayān”、“Ilm al-Ma”ānī和“Ilm al-Bādī”中Balaghah科学的编辑构成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
QOF
QOF
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信