A Tale of Two Marxisms: Remembering Erik Olin Wright (1947–2019)*

IF 4.1 2区社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Politics & Society Pub Date : 2020-11-16 DOI:10.1177/0032329220966075

M. Burawoy

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Intended to capture the entangled history of Marxism, Alvin Gouldner’s two Marxisms also frame the intellectual biography of Erik Olin Wright. In the 1970s Wright’s Scientific and Critical Marxisms were joined, but later they came apart as each developed its own autonomous trajectory. Erik’s Scientific Marxism was the program of class analysis that first brought him international fame. Begun in graduate school, it tailed off in the last two decades of his life, when it played second fiddle to the Critical Marxism of the Real Utopias Project that Erik began in the early 1990s.

查看原文本刊更多论文

两个马克思主义者的故事：纪念埃里克·奥林·赖特（1947–2019）*

为了捕捉马克思主义纠缠的历史，阿尔文·古尔德纳的两本马克思主义也为埃里克·奥林·赖特的知识分子传记奠定了框架。20世纪70年代，赖特的科学马克思主义和批判马克思主义结合在一起，但后来随着各自发展出自己的自主轨迹，它们分崩离析。埃里克的科学马克思主义是最早为他带来国际声誉的阶级分析纲领。它始于研究生院，在他生命的最后二十年逐渐衰落，当时它是Erik在20世纪90年代初开始的真正乌托邦项目的批判马克思主义的副手。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Politics & Society Multiple-

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

4.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.