Party system closure: party alliances, government alternatives, and democracy in Europe Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. $100.00, 320 Pages

IF 1.7 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Davide Vittori
{"title":"Party system closure: party alliances, government alternatives, and democracy in Europe Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. $100.00, 320 Pages","authors":"Davide Vittori","doi":"10.1017/ipo.2021.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Party System Closure. Party alliances, Government Alternatives, and Democracy in Europe (Oxford 2021) written by Fernando Casal-Bertoa and Zslot Enyedi is a unique, informative and insightful longitudinal study of how European countries were governed in the last century. Before assessing the methodological advancements that the book proposes in the study of party system institutionalization, it is worth noting that scholars and students who are not famil-iar with this branch of political science will find in the book a massive amount of information about governments in small and big countries in Europe. The book includes data for much-analysed countries in Western, Eastern and Southern Europe, but also for micro-states (such as San Marino, Andorra and Liechtenstein) or other under-analysed countries (Albania, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia). The third chapter in this regard provides a very informative analysis of the functioning of current party systems in Europe, while chapter four adds to this an historical account of defunct party systems (24 in total). The geographical scope allows the authors to both drawing inferences from the whole universe of elections in Europe (and not just a sample of them). This is per se an ambitious achievement; yet, Casal-Bertoa and Enyedi go beyond this, adding to a cross-time dataset a new analytical perspective which constitutes a significant step forward in the study of European party systems. In fact, the explicit aim of the book is to present a new measurement, based on the patterns of parties ’ interactions in government, for the often-elusive concept of party system institutionalization. The authors, drawing from the work of Peter use the concept of ‘ closure ’ to measure","PeriodicalId":43368,"journal":{"name":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Party System Closure. Party alliances, Government Alternatives, and Democracy in Europe (Oxford 2021) written by Fernando Casal-Bertoa and Zslot Enyedi is a unique, informative and insightful longitudinal study of how European countries were governed in the last century. Before assessing the methodological advancements that the book proposes in the study of party system institutionalization, it is worth noting that scholars and students who are not famil-iar with this branch of political science will find in the book a massive amount of information about governments in small and big countries in Europe. The book includes data for much-analysed countries in Western, Eastern and Southern Europe, but also for micro-states (such as San Marino, Andorra and Liechtenstein) or other under-analysed countries (Albania, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia). The third chapter in this regard provides a very informative analysis of the functioning of current party systems in Europe, while chapter four adds to this an historical account of defunct party systems (24 in total). The geographical scope allows the authors to both drawing inferences from the whole universe of elections in Europe (and not just a sample of them). This is per se an ambitious achievement; yet, Casal-Bertoa and Enyedi go beyond this, adding to a cross-time dataset a new analytical perspective which constitutes a significant step forward in the study of European party systems. In fact, the explicit aim of the book is to present a new measurement, based on the patterns of parties ’ interactions in government, for the often-elusive concept of party system institutionalization. The authors, drawing from the work of Peter use the concept of ‘ closure ’ to measure
政党制度封闭:政党联盟、政府替代与欧洲民主牛津:牛津大学出版社,2021。100美元,320页
党的制度关闭。Fernando Casal Bertoa和Zslot Enyedi撰写的《政党联盟、政府替代方案和欧洲民主》(牛津2021)是对上个世纪欧洲国家治理方式的一项独特、信息丰富、见解深刻的纵向研究。在评估本书在政党制度化研究中提出的方法论进步之前,值得注意的是,不熟悉这一政治学分支的学者和学生会在书中发现大量关于欧洲大小国家政府的信息。该书包括西欧、东欧和南欧分析较多的国家的数据,也包括微观国家(如圣马力诺、安道尔和列支敦士登)或其他分析不足的国家(阿尔巴尼亚、摩尔多瓦、黑山、北马其顿)的数据。这方面的第三章对欧洲现行政党制度的运作进行了非常翔实的分析,而第四章则对已失效的政党制度进行了历史描述(共24个)。地理范围使作者既可以从欧洲选举的整个宇宙中得出推论(而不仅仅是其中的一个样本)。这本身就是一项雄心勃勃的成就;然而,Casal Bertoa和Enyedi超越了这一点,为跨时间数据集添加了一个新的分析视角,这是欧洲政党制度研究的重要一步。事实上,这本书的明确目的是基于政党在政府中的互动模式,为政党制度化这一经常难以捉摸的概念提供一种新的衡量标准。作者根据Peter的作品,使用“闭包”的概念来衡量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信