Silence as Political Strategy in Art: A Study of Susan Sontag’s Alice in Bed

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Prity Barnwal, Rajni Singh
{"title":"Silence as Political Strategy in Art: A Study of Susan Sontag’s Alice in Bed","authors":"Prity Barnwal, Rajni Singh","doi":"10.1080/20512856.2021.1935497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper explores the politics of silence as a language of resistance through the prism of feminist discourse in Susan Sontag’s Alice in Bed (1993). Silence marks an essential presence in Sontag’s writings ranging from her essays to her creative oeuvres. Sontag’s initial approach to silence has been that of a modernist aesthete where she understood silence as an aesthetic prospect in art. However, her unwavering belief in the ‘aesthetics of silence’, that came out as a theme of whatever she has written after her 1967 essay of the same name, led Sontag to explore first the moral response (as seen in her essays like Bergman’s Persona and Fascinating Fascism) and ultimately the political strategy behind the use of silence. The politics of silence in the play Alice in Bed becomes quite elusive and strategic. The imperative of silence as a performative aesthetics is recognised in the exemplary decisions of the women characters in the play that choose silence to reflect the abuses and deceptions of patriarchal language and resist the patriarchal disservices inflicted upon women’s intelligibility and emotionality.","PeriodicalId":40530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Literature and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20512856.2021.1935497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20512856.2021.1935497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper explores the politics of silence as a language of resistance through the prism of feminist discourse in Susan Sontag’s Alice in Bed (1993). Silence marks an essential presence in Sontag’s writings ranging from her essays to her creative oeuvres. Sontag’s initial approach to silence has been that of a modernist aesthete where she understood silence as an aesthetic prospect in art. However, her unwavering belief in the ‘aesthetics of silence’, that came out as a theme of whatever she has written after her 1967 essay of the same name, led Sontag to explore first the moral response (as seen in her essays like Bergman’s Persona and Fascinating Fascism) and ultimately the political strategy behind the use of silence. The politics of silence in the play Alice in Bed becomes quite elusive and strategic. The imperative of silence as a performative aesthetics is recognised in the exemplary decisions of the women characters in the play that choose silence to reflect the abuses and deceptions of patriarchal language and resist the patriarchal disservices inflicted upon women’s intelligibility and emotionality.
沉默作为艺术中的政治策略:苏珊·桑塔格《床上的爱丽丝》研究
摘要本文从苏珊·桑塔格的《爱丽丝梦游仙境》(1993)中女性主义话语的角度,探讨沉默作为一种反抗语言的政治。沉默在桑塔格的作品中占有重要地位,从她的散文到她的创造性作品。桑塔格最初对沉默的态度是一位现代主义唯美主义者,她将沉默理解为艺术中的一种美学前景。然而,她对“沉默美学”的坚定信念,是她1967年同名文章后所写的一切的主题,导致桑塔格首先探索了道德回应(正如她在《伯格曼的人格》和《迷人的法西斯主义》等文章中所看到的那样),并最终探索了沉默背后的政治策略。戏剧《爱丽丝梦游仙境》中的沉默政治变得相当难以捉摸和战略性。沉默作为一种表演美学的必要性在剧中女性角色的模范决定中得到了认可,她们选择沉默来反映父权语言的滥用和欺骗,并抵制父权对女性可理解性和情感性的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信