Beyond Ethics: Considerations for Centering Equity-Minded Data Science

IF 0.3 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Nathan Alexander, Carrie Eaton, A. Shrout, Belin Tsinnajinnie, Krystal Tsosie
{"title":"Beyond Ethics: Considerations for Centering Equity-Minded Data Science","authors":"Nathan Alexander, Carrie Eaton, A. Shrout, Belin Tsinnajinnie, Krystal Tsosie","doi":"10.5642/jhummath.ocys6929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we utilize duoethnography — a research method in which practitioners discursively interrogate the relationships between culture, context, and the mechanisms which shape individual autobiographical experiences — to explore what may be beyond ethics in the context of data science. Although ethical frameworks have the ability to reflect cultural priorities, a singular view of ethics, as we explore, often fails to speak to the multiple and diverse priorities held both within and across institutional spaces. To that end, this paper explores multiple perspectives, epistemologies, and worldviews that can collectively push researchers towards considerations of a data science education that is equity-minded both in concept and practice. Through a set of dialogues which examine our positionalities, journeys, ethics, local cultures, and accountabilities, this paper explores the contextual realities rooted in the authors’ educational settings. These conversations focus on the humanity of our students, the communities from which we come from and serve, as well as the unintentional harms and possibilities associated with the development of data science programs across institutional types. We take a set of five core questions to examine how we made, and continue to make, sense of our diverse cultural perspectives on data science education and equity with/in relation to others’ realities. Broadly, this paper seeks to offer reflections on the related but differing functions of ethics and equity in data science education.","PeriodicalId":42411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanistic Mathematics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanistic Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.ocys6929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we utilize duoethnography — a research method in which practitioners discursively interrogate the relationships between culture, context, and the mechanisms which shape individual autobiographical experiences — to explore what may be beyond ethics in the context of data science. Although ethical frameworks have the ability to reflect cultural priorities, a singular view of ethics, as we explore, often fails to speak to the multiple and diverse priorities held both within and across institutional spaces. To that end, this paper explores multiple perspectives, epistemologies, and worldviews that can collectively push researchers towards considerations of a data science education that is equity-minded both in concept and practice. Through a set of dialogues which examine our positionalities, journeys, ethics, local cultures, and accountabilities, this paper explores the contextual realities rooted in the authors’ educational settings. These conversations focus on the humanity of our students, the communities from which we come from and serve, as well as the unintentional harms and possibilities associated with the development of data science programs across institutional types. We take a set of five core questions to examine how we made, and continue to make, sense of our diverse cultural perspectives on data science education and equity with/in relation to others’ realities. Broadly, this paper seeks to offer reflections on the related but differing functions of ethics and equity in data science education.
超越伦理:以公平意识的数据科学为中心的考虑
在这篇论文中,我们利用双民族志——一种研究方法,从业者对文化、背景和塑造个人自传体经历的机制之间的关系进行讨论——来探索数据科学背景下可能超越伦理的东西。尽管伦理框架有能力重新反映文化优先事项,但正如我们所探索的那样,单一的伦理观往往无法反映机构内部和跨机构空间的多重和多样的优先事项。为此,本文探索了多种视角、认识论和世界观,这些视角、认识观和世界观可以共同推动研究人员考虑在概念和实践上都具有公平意识的数据科学教育。通过一系列对话,考察我们的立场、旅程、道德、当地文化和责任,本文探讨了植根于作者教育环境中的背景现实。这些对话的重点是我们学生的人性,我们来自和服务的社区,以及与跨机构类型的数据科学项目开发相关的无意伤害和可能性。我们提出了一组五个核心问题,以考察我们是如何理解并继续理解我们对数据科学教育和公平的不同文化观点的,以及与他人的现实相联系的。从广义上讲,本文试图对数据科学教育中伦理和公平的相关但不同的功能进行反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Humanistic Mathematics
Journal of Humanistic Mathematics HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信