Beyond a Genealogy of Human Rights. Introduction to a Discussion Forum

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Ivo Cerman
{"title":"Beyond a Genealogy of Human Rights. Introduction to a Discussion Forum","authors":"Ivo Cerman","doi":"10.32725/oph.2020.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"General histories of human rights have become quite popular recently . Suffice it to say that while I was working on this discussion forum, one more big history of human rights was published, and several more are being prepared .1 There is an upsurge of scholarly interest in this topic, there is a lot of energy invested in it, but in which direction should this energy be channeled? In what follows, I will first try to explain the situation which prompted me to organize this forum, and secondly, provide a summary of Dan Edelstein ́s new book On the Spirit of Rights, which is the subject of our comments .2 Unfortunately, the field has been dominated by two prolific American authors who tend towards extremely simplistic views, which present, I believe, a dangerous obstacle to a free exploration of the early history of human rights in the Age of Enlightenment . This is not to deny that Jonathan Israel helped to rehabilitate intellectual history and that Samuel Moyn recalled the significance of Jimmy Carter ́s human rights campaign, but the interpretative frameworks behind these achievements are rather reductive, to say the least . Whereas Jonathan Israel with his atheism-oriented interpretation3 has found respect but no imitators, Samuel Moyn, with his insistence on the „breakthrough moment“ in the 1970s,4 did find several followers among historians of the twentieth century .5 This new chronology goes hand in hand with a silent reshuffling of human rights","PeriodicalId":36082,"journal":{"name":"Opera Historica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opera Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/oph.2020.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

General histories of human rights have become quite popular recently . Suffice it to say that while I was working on this discussion forum, one more big history of human rights was published, and several more are being prepared .1 There is an upsurge of scholarly interest in this topic, there is a lot of energy invested in it, but in which direction should this energy be channeled? In what follows, I will first try to explain the situation which prompted me to organize this forum, and secondly, provide a summary of Dan Edelstein ́s new book On the Spirit of Rights, which is the subject of our comments .2 Unfortunately, the field has been dominated by two prolific American authors who tend towards extremely simplistic views, which present, I believe, a dangerous obstacle to a free exploration of the early history of human rights in the Age of Enlightenment . This is not to deny that Jonathan Israel helped to rehabilitate intellectual history and that Samuel Moyn recalled the significance of Jimmy Carter ́s human rights campaign, but the interpretative frameworks behind these achievements are rather reductive, to say the least . Whereas Jonathan Israel with his atheism-oriented interpretation3 has found respect but no imitators, Samuel Moyn, with his insistence on the „breakthrough moment“ in the 1970s,4 did find several followers among historians of the twentieth century .5 This new chronology goes hand in hand with a silent reshuffling of human rights
《超越人权谱系》论坛简介
人权通史最近很受欢迎。可以说,当我在这个讨论论坛上工作时,又出版了一本关于人权的大历史,还有几本正在编写中。1学术界对这个话题的兴趣高涨,投入了大量的精力,但这种精力应该引导到哪个方向?在下文中,我将首先尝试解释促使我组织这次论坛的情况,其次,提供Dan Edelsteiń的新书《论权利的精神》的摘要,这是我们评论的主题。2不幸的是,该领域一直由两位多产的美国作家主导,他们倾向于极端简单化的观点,我认为,这是自由探索启蒙时代早期人权史的一个危险障碍。这并不是否认乔纳森·伊斯雷尔帮助恢复了知识史,塞缪尔·莫因回忆起吉米·卡特人权运动的重要性,但至少可以说,这些成就背后的解释框架相当简化。乔纳森·伊斯雷尔(Jonathan Israel)以无神论为导向的解释3得到了尊重,但没有效仿者,而塞缪尔·莫因(Samuel Moyn)则在20世纪70年代坚持“突破时刻”,4在20世纪历史学家中找到了几位追随者。5这一新的年表与人权的无声重组齐头并进
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Opera Historica
Opera Historica Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信