Quantitative Evaluation of Leaf Inclination Angle Distribution on Leaf Area Index Retrieval of Coniferous Canopies

遥感学报 Pub Date : 2021-04-12 DOI:10.34133/2021/2708904
G. Yan, Hailan Jiang, Jinghui Luo, X. Mu, Fan Li, Jianbo Qi, Ronghai Hu, D. Xie, Guoqing Zhou
{"title":"Quantitative Evaluation of Leaf Inclination Angle Distribution on Leaf Area Index Retrieval of Coniferous Canopies","authors":"G. Yan, Hailan Jiang, Jinghui Luo, X. Mu, Fan Li, Jianbo Qi, Ronghai Hu, D. Xie, Guoqing Zhou","doi":"10.34133/2021/2708904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both leaf inclination angle distribution (LAD) and leaf area index (LAI) dominate optical remote sensing signals. The G-function, which is a function of LAD and remote sensing geometry, is often set to 0.5 in the LAI retrieval of coniferous canopies even though this assumption is only valid for spherical LAD. Large uncertainties are thus introduced. However, because numerous tiny leaves grow on conifers, it is nearly impossible to quantitatively evaluate such uncertainties in LAI retrieval. In this study, we proposed a method to characterize the possible change of G-function of coniferous canopies as well as its effect on LAI retrieval. Specifically, a Multi-Directional Imager (MDI) was developed to capture stereo images of the branches, and the needles were reconstructed. The accuracy of the inclination angles calculated from the reconstructed needles was high. Moreover, we analyzed whether a spherical distribution is a valid assumption for coniferous canopies by calculating the possible range of the G-function from the measured LADs of branches of Larch and Spruce and the true G-functions of other species from some existing inventory data and three-dimensional (3D) tree models. Results show that the constant G assumption introduces large errors in LAI retrieval, which could be as large as 53% in the zenithal viewing direction used by spaceborne LiDAR. As a result, accurate LAD estimation is recommended. In the absence of such data, our results show that a viewing zenith angle between 45 and 65 degrees is a good choice, at which the errors of LAI retrieval caused by the spherical assumption will be less than 10% for coniferous canopies.","PeriodicalId":38304,"journal":{"name":"遥感学报","volume":"2021 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"遥感学报","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/2708904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Both leaf inclination angle distribution (LAD) and leaf area index (LAI) dominate optical remote sensing signals. The G-function, which is a function of LAD and remote sensing geometry, is often set to 0.5 in the LAI retrieval of coniferous canopies even though this assumption is only valid for spherical LAD. Large uncertainties are thus introduced. However, because numerous tiny leaves grow on conifers, it is nearly impossible to quantitatively evaluate such uncertainties in LAI retrieval. In this study, we proposed a method to characterize the possible change of G-function of coniferous canopies as well as its effect on LAI retrieval. Specifically, a Multi-Directional Imager (MDI) was developed to capture stereo images of the branches, and the needles were reconstructed. The accuracy of the inclination angles calculated from the reconstructed needles was high. Moreover, we analyzed whether a spherical distribution is a valid assumption for coniferous canopies by calculating the possible range of the G-function from the measured LADs of branches of Larch and Spruce and the true G-functions of other species from some existing inventory data and three-dimensional (3D) tree models. Results show that the constant G assumption introduces large errors in LAI retrieval, which could be as large as 53% in the zenithal viewing direction used by spaceborne LiDAR. As a result, accurate LAD estimation is recommended. In the absence of such data, our results show that a viewing zenith angle between 45 and 65 degrees is a good choice, at which the errors of LAI retrieval caused by the spherical assumption will be less than 10% for coniferous canopies.
针叶冠层叶面积指数反演中叶倾角分布的定量评价
叶倾角分布(LAD)和叶面积指数(LAI)均主导着光学遥感信号。G函数是LAD和遥感几何的函数,在针叶冠层的LAI反演中通常设置为0.5,尽管这一假设仅适用于球形LAD。因此引入了很大的不确定性。然而,由于针叶树上生长着许多微小的叶子,在LAI检索中几乎不可能定量评估这种不确定性。在本研究中,我们提出了一种方法来表征针叶冠层G函数的可能变化及其对LAI反演的影响。具体而言,开发了一种多向成像仪(MDI)来捕捉树枝的立体图像,并对针头进行了重建。从重建的针头计算出的倾斜角度的精度很高。此外,我们通过从落叶松和云杉枝条的LAD测量中计算G函数的可能范围,以及从一些现有的库存数据和三维(3D)树木模型中计算其他物种的真实G函数,分析了球形分布是否是针叶树冠层的有效假设。结果表明,常数G假设在LAI反演中引入了较大的误差,在星载激光雷达使用的天顶视角方向上,误差可能高达53%。因此,建议进行准确的LAD估计。在没有这些数据的情况下,我们的结果表明,45度至65度之间的观测天顶角是一个很好的选择,在这个角度下,由球面假设引起的针叶冠层LAI反演误差将小于10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
遥感学报
遥感学报 Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3200
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信