LORD BYRON (1788–1824) AS THE PRECURSOR OF CELEBRITIES ENDORSING VACCINE HESITANCY: A CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL LESSON FOR COVID-19 IMMUNISATION STRATEGIES

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
F. Galassi, Luigi Ingaliso, V. Vittori, M. Habicht, A. Cossarizza, E. Varotto
{"title":"LORD BYRON (1788–1824) AS THE PRECURSOR OF CELEBRITIES ENDORSING VACCINE HESITANCY: A CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL LESSON FOR COVID-19 IMMUNISATION STRATEGIES","authors":"F. Galassi, Luigi Ingaliso, V. Vittori, M. Habicht, A. Cossarizza, E. Varotto","doi":"10.26720/anthro.21.06.01.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lord Byron can be classified as the prototype of contemporary celebrities endorsing pseudo-scientific views and opposing vaccination policies based on his public statements, while privately he appears to have had double standards since he had his page inoculated against smallpox. Through a review of the biomedical and historical literature this paper examines the role of the example given by celebrities during vaccination campaigns,focusing on the historical figure of Lord Byron. A reassessment of his writings on the topic of vaccination (cowpox inoculation)is then performed and put in the greater context of celebrities, past and present, commenting in favour or against immunisation policies. Byron's case demonstrates how health institutions should not underestimate the influence of 'VIPs' on the success of vaccinations, and should seek their help and positive example when trying to persuade the general population of the importance of vaccinations.","PeriodicalId":43909,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologie-International Journal of Human Diversity and Evolution","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologie-International Journal of Human Diversity and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26720/anthro.21.06.01.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lord Byron can be classified as the prototype of contemporary celebrities endorsing pseudo-scientific views and opposing vaccination policies based on his public statements, while privately he appears to have had double standards since he had his page inoculated against smallpox. Through a review of the biomedical and historical literature this paper examines the role of the example given by celebrities during vaccination campaigns,focusing on the historical figure of Lord Byron. A reassessment of his writings on the topic of vaccination (cowpox inoculation)is then performed and put in the greater context of celebrities, past and present, commenting in favour or against immunisation policies. Byron's case demonstrates how health institutions should not underestimate the influence of 'VIPs' on the success of vaccinations, and should seek their help and positive example when trying to persuade the general population of the importance of vaccinations.
拜伦勋爵(1788–1824)作为支持疫苗接种的细胞的先驱:新冠肺炎免疫策略的文化人类学课程
拜伦勋爵可以被归类为当代名人的原型,根据他的公开声明,他支持伪科学观点,反对疫苗接种政策,而私下里,他似乎有双重标准,因为他让他的页面接种了天花疫苗。通过对生物医学和历史文献的回顾,本文考察了名人在疫苗接种运动中所起的榜样作用,重点关注拜伦勋爵的历史人物。然后对他关于疫苗接种(牛痘接种)主题的著作进行重新评估,并将其置于名人的更大背景下,过去和现在,评论支持或反对免疫政策。拜伦的案例表明,卫生机构不应低估“大人物”对疫苗接种成功的影响,在试图说服普通民众接种疫苗的重要性时,应该寻求他们的帮助和积极的榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信