متن ِقرآن کریم پر تھیوڈور نولڈیکے کے اعتراضات :جرمن تحریکِ استشراق کے تناظر میں تجزیاتی مطالعہ

Riaz Ahmad Saeed, Muhammad Khubaib
{"title":"متن ِقرآن کریم پر تھیوڈور نولڈیکے کے اعتراضات :جرمن تحریکِ استشراق کے تناظر میں تجزیاتی مطالعہ","authors":"Riaz Ahmad Saeed, Muhammad Khubaib","doi":"10.36476/jirs.5:2.12.2020.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a fact that the majority of the Orientalists consider the Holy Qur’ān as the primary source of Islamic faith, worship and teachings, so most of them have tried their best to make Qur’ān unauthentic and contradictory. For that purpose, they have directed to devote all their efforts to prove it a human-authored book. Consequently, they want to prove the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as a fabricated Prophet. In this regard, Theodore Noldeke is a German Orientalist who has some objections to the text of the Holy Quran. In this paper, efforts are made to respond to these objections of Noldeke. Furthermore, the study analyzed the Orientalist movement in the German context. It is perceived as an eye open truth the Holy Quran is free from any human error and textual amendment but at that point, Theodore Noldeke tries to get benefit from diverse and somehow weak Tafsīr literature and Muslim scholarly difference of opinion in this regard. Moreover, German Orientalism is an important chapter of the Global Orientalists Movement but the world could able to know it later. Therefore, this study recommends that Muslim scholars must respond to the objections and reservations of German Orientalists in the proper and best way. Analytical research methodology has been adopted in this study with a qualitative approach.","PeriodicalId":56212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36476/jirs.5:2.12.2020.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is a fact that the majority of the Orientalists consider the Holy Qur’ān as the primary source of Islamic faith, worship and teachings, so most of them have tried their best to make Qur’ān unauthentic and contradictory. For that purpose, they have directed to devote all their efforts to prove it a human-authored book. Consequently, they want to prove the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as a fabricated Prophet. In this regard, Theodore Noldeke is a German Orientalist who has some objections to the text of the Holy Quran. In this paper, efforts are made to respond to these objections of Noldeke. Furthermore, the study analyzed the Orientalist movement in the German context. It is perceived as an eye open truth the Holy Quran is free from any human error and textual amendment but at that point, Theodore Noldeke tries to get benefit from diverse and somehow weak Tafsīr literature and Muslim scholarly difference of opinion in this regard. Moreover, German Orientalism is an important chapter of the Global Orientalists Movement but the world could able to know it later. Therefore, this study recommends that Muslim scholars must respond to the objections and reservations of German Orientalists in the proper and best way. Analytical research methodology has been adopted in this study with a qualitative approach.
事实上,大多数东方主义者认为《古兰经ān》是伊斯兰教信仰、崇拜和教义的主要来源,因此他们中的大多数人尽其所能地使《古兰经ān》变得不真实和矛盾。为此,他们指示要尽一切努力证明这是一本由人类撰写的书。因此,他们想要证明神圣的先知穆罕默德(PBUH)是一个虚构的先知。在这方面,Theodore Noldeke是一位德国东方学家,他对《古兰经》的文本有一些异议。本文试图回应诺尔德克的这些反对意见。此外,本文还分析了德国语境下的东方学运动。它被认为是一个开放的真理,神圣的古兰经没有任何人为错误和文本修改,但在这一点上,西奥多·诺尔德克试图从不同的,有些软弱的塔夫斯基文学和穆斯林学者在这方面的不同观点中获益。此外,德国东方学是全球东方学运动的一个重要篇章,但世界认识它的时间要晚一些。因此,本研究建议穆斯林学者必须以适当和最佳的方式回应德国东方学家的反对和保留。本研究采用分析研究方法,并采用定性研究方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信