{"title":"Diachronic developments in fricative + nasal sequences","authors":"Katia Chirkova, Zev Handel","doi":"10.1075/jhl.21020.chi","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Through comparison of regular sound correspondences in three closely related Tibeto-Burman (TB) languages, Ersu,\n Lizu, and Duoxu (collectively “ELD”), informed by external comparison with other TB languages and recent phonetic analyses of the\n production of voiceless nasals, we reconstruct *fricative-nasal sequences in their common ancestor, Proto-ELD.\n In the development of these historic clusters, two pathways of change can be recognized. Their difference lies in\n the divergent relative phasing of velic and oral gestures in the original fricative-nasal sequences:\n \n \n \n (i)\n fricative weakening (from a tight cluster): *FN > N̥ > h̃ > x\n \n \n (ii)\n fricative strengthening (from a loose cluster): *F-n > *F-t > t > k or *F‑n > s\n \n \n \n The different reflexes observed in Ersu, Lizu, and Duoxu represent different points along these two developmental\n pathways. These reconstructions and pathways of development have implications for our understanding of both universal (phonetic)\n and language-specific aspects of change in fricative-nasal sequences. The first pathway makes it possible to explore the process\n of nasal devoicing beyond voiceless nasals so as to enrich our understanding of nasal devoicing in natural languages. The\n co-existence of two opposite pathways of change, on the other hand, provides insights into the morphological and syllabic\n structure of words with contiguous fricative-nasal sequences in ELD languages at different points in time – insights that may be\n valuable in examining the history of other languages and language families beyond the ELD cluster.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21020.chi","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Through comparison of regular sound correspondences in three closely related Tibeto-Burman (TB) languages, Ersu,
Lizu, and Duoxu (collectively “ELD”), informed by external comparison with other TB languages and recent phonetic analyses of the
production of voiceless nasals, we reconstruct *fricative-nasal sequences in their common ancestor, Proto-ELD.
In the development of these historic clusters, two pathways of change can be recognized. Their difference lies in
the divergent relative phasing of velic and oral gestures in the original fricative-nasal sequences:
(i)
fricative weakening (from a tight cluster): *FN > N̥ > h̃ > x
(ii)
fricative strengthening (from a loose cluster): *F-n > *F-t > t > k or *F‑n > s
The different reflexes observed in Ersu, Lizu, and Duoxu represent different points along these two developmental
pathways. These reconstructions and pathways of development have implications for our understanding of both universal (phonetic)
and language-specific aspects of change in fricative-nasal sequences. The first pathway makes it possible to explore the process
of nasal devoicing beyond voiceless nasals so as to enrich our understanding of nasal devoicing in natural languages. The
co-existence of two opposite pathways of change, on the other hand, provides insights into the morphological and syllabic
structure of words with contiguous fricative-nasal sequences in ELD languages at different points in time – insights that may be
valuable in examining the history of other languages and language families beyond the ELD cluster.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.