Diachronic developments in fricative + nasal sequences

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Katia Chirkova, Zev Handel
{"title":"Diachronic developments in fricative + nasal sequences","authors":"Katia Chirkova, Zev Handel","doi":"10.1075/jhl.21020.chi","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Through comparison of regular sound correspondences in three closely related Tibeto-Burman (TB) languages, Ersu,\n Lizu, and Duoxu (collectively “ELD”), informed by external comparison with other TB languages and recent phonetic analyses of the\n production of voiceless nasals, we reconstruct *fricative-nasal sequences in their common ancestor, Proto-ELD.\n In the development of these historic clusters, two pathways of change can be recognized. Their difference lies in\n the divergent relative phasing of velic and oral gestures in the original fricative-nasal sequences:\n \n \n \n (i)\n fricative weakening (from a tight cluster): *FN > N̥ > h̃ > x\n \n \n (ii)\n fricative strengthening (from a loose cluster): *F-n > *F-t > t > k or *F‑n > s\n \n \n \n The different reflexes observed in Ersu, Lizu, and Duoxu represent different points along these two developmental\n pathways. These reconstructions and pathways of development have implications for our understanding of both universal (phonetic)\n and language-specific aspects of change in fricative-nasal sequences. The first pathway makes it possible to explore the process\n of nasal devoicing beyond voiceless nasals so as to enrich our understanding of nasal devoicing in natural languages. The\n co-existence of two opposite pathways of change, on the other hand, provides insights into the morphological and syllabic\n structure of words with contiguous fricative-nasal sequences in ELD languages at different points in time – insights that may be\n valuable in examining the history of other languages and language families beyond the ELD cluster.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21020.chi","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through comparison of regular sound correspondences in three closely related Tibeto-Burman (TB) languages, Ersu, Lizu, and Duoxu (collectively “ELD”), informed by external comparison with other TB languages and recent phonetic analyses of the production of voiceless nasals, we reconstruct *fricative-nasal sequences in their common ancestor, Proto-ELD. In the development of these historic clusters, two pathways of change can be recognized. Their difference lies in the divergent relative phasing of velic and oral gestures in the original fricative-nasal sequences: (i) fricative weakening (from a tight cluster): *FN > N̥ > h̃ > x (ii) fricative strengthening (from a loose cluster): *F-n > *F-t > t > k or *F‑n > s The different reflexes observed in Ersu, Lizu, and Duoxu represent different points along these two developmental pathways. These reconstructions and pathways of development have implications for our understanding of both universal (phonetic) and language-specific aspects of change in fricative-nasal sequences. The first pathway makes it possible to explore the process of nasal devoicing beyond voiceless nasals so as to enrich our understanding of nasal devoicing in natural languages. The co-existence of two opposite pathways of change, on the other hand, provides insights into the morphological and syllabic structure of words with contiguous fricative-nasal sequences in ELD languages at different points in time – insights that may be valuable in examining the history of other languages and language families beyond the ELD cluster.
摩擦音+鼻音序列的历时发展
通过比较三种密切相关的台伯语族(TB)语言,即尔苏语、黎祖语和多须语(统称“ELD”)的规则发音对应关系,并根据与其他台伯语的外部比较和最近对无声鼻音产生的语音分析,我们重建了它们共同祖先原ELD中的*擦音鼻音序列。在这些历史集群的发展过程中,可以认识到两条变化的途径。它们的差异在于原始擦音鼻序列中的速度和口语手势的相对相位不同:(i)擦音弱化(来自紧密簇):*FN>N̥>hõ>x(ii)擦音强化(来自松散簇):*F-N>*F-t>t>k或*F‑N>s在Ersu、Lizu、,和多旭代表了这两条发展道路上的不同点。这些重建和发展途径对我们理解擦音鼻序列变化的普遍(语音)和语言特定方面都有意义。第一条途径使我们有可能在无声鼻腔之外探索鼻腔泥化过程,从而丰富我们对自然语言中鼻腔泥化的理解。另一方面,两种相反的变化途径的共存,为不同时间点ELD语言中具有连续擦音鼻序列的单词的形态和音节结构提供了见解——这些见解可能对研究ELD集群之外的其他语言和语系的历史有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Journal of Historical Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信