{"title":"Complications of Instrumental Vaginal Deliveries and Associated Factors in Suhul General Hospital, Shire, North-West Tigray, Ethiopia","authors":"S. Gebre, A. Hailu","doi":"10.4172/2329-9126.10002300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instrumental vaginal delivery is a key element of essential obstetric care, and scaling up its use in resource poor \n countries through training and supply of appropriate equipment is likely to contribute significantly to reduce maternal \n and newborn morbidity and mortality and objective of the study was to assess complications of instrumental vaginal \n delivery and associated factors. A two years retrospective cross sectional analytical study was conducted from July \n 2013 to June 2015 in the obstetric department of Shire, Suhul General Hospital, North-West zone, Tigray Ethiopia. \n Records of 357 mothers managed with operative vaginal delivery were retrieved, 224 (62.7%) were rural residents. \n Low instrumental vaginal delivery was the most common type of practiced station (208, 58.3%) but mid instrumental \n delivery is highly associated with complications [AOR 95% CI 12.2 (4.79-31, 4)]. Fetal distress was the most \n common indication of operative vaginal deliveries, 158 (44.3%) as well as the commonest cause of low 1st minute \n Apgar score, 97 (54.8%). More than half of mothers were assisted with forceps, 187 (52.4%), and it was the, \n commonest cause for perineal tear (67.4%) and significantly associated with feto maternal complications [AOR 95% \n CI 1.73 (1.07-2.80)]. Even though forceps had higher maternal complications, vacuum extraction has higher fetal \n complications. We conclude that obstructed labor (OL), mid pelvic instrument application, increases in birth weight \n and forceps application were significantly associated with feto maternal complications.","PeriodicalId":90594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of general practice (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9126.10002300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Instrumental vaginal delivery is a key element of essential obstetric care, and scaling up its use in resource poor
countries through training and supply of appropriate equipment is likely to contribute significantly to reduce maternal
and newborn morbidity and mortality and objective of the study was to assess complications of instrumental vaginal
delivery and associated factors. A two years retrospective cross sectional analytical study was conducted from July
2013 to June 2015 in the obstetric department of Shire, Suhul General Hospital, North-West zone, Tigray Ethiopia.
Records of 357 mothers managed with operative vaginal delivery were retrieved, 224 (62.7%) were rural residents.
Low instrumental vaginal delivery was the most common type of practiced station (208, 58.3%) but mid instrumental
delivery is highly associated with complications [AOR 95% CI 12.2 (4.79-31, 4)]. Fetal distress was the most
common indication of operative vaginal deliveries, 158 (44.3%) as well as the commonest cause of low 1st minute
Apgar score, 97 (54.8%). More than half of mothers were assisted with forceps, 187 (52.4%), and it was the,
commonest cause for perineal tear (67.4%) and significantly associated with feto maternal complications [AOR 95%
CI 1.73 (1.07-2.80)]. Even though forceps had higher maternal complications, vacuum extraction has higher fetal
complications. We conclude that obstructed labor (OL), mid pelvic instrument application, increases in birth weight
and forceps application were significantly associated with feto maternal complications.
阴道器械分娩是基本产科护理的一个关键要素,通过培训和提供适当的设备,在资源贫乏的国家扩大其使用,可能会大大有助于降低孕产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率。这项研究的目的是评估阴道器械分娩的并发症和相关因素。2013年7月至2015年6月,在埃塞俄比亚提格雷西北地区苏胡尔总医院郡产科进行了为期两年的回顾性横断面分析研究。共检索357例经阴道手术分娩的产妇,其中农村居民224例(62.7%)。低位器械阴道分娩是最常见的产科方式(208,58.3%),但中段器械分娩与并发症高度相关[AOR 95% CI 12.2(4.79- 31,4)]。胎儿窘迫是阴道手术分娩最常见的指征,158例(44.3%),也是导致第1分钟Apgar评分低的最常见原因,97例(54.8%)。超过一半的母亲使用了产钳,187例(52.4%),是会阴撕裂最常见的原因(67.4%),并与胎母并发症显著相关[AOR 95% CI 1.73(1.07-2.80)]。尽管产钳有较高的产妇并发症,真空抽吸有较高的胎儿并发症。我们的结论是,难产(OL),骨盆中部器械的使用,出生体重的增加和产钳的使用与胎母并发症显著相关。