Identifying and prioritising process portfolio for sustaining an effective business process management lifecycle

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Güzin Özdağoğlu, Aşkın Özdağoğlu, Muhammet Damar
{"title":"Identifying and prioritising process portfolio for sustaining an effective business process management lifecycle","authors":"Güzin Özdağoğlu,&nbsp;Aşkın Özdağoğlu,&nbsp;Muhammet Damar","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to develop a pipeline for identifying and prioritising the processes to include in business process management (BPM) initiatives by considering the obstacles for giving equal importance to the processes performed in businesses. The paper proposes the use of a process classification framework as a reference for process identification and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods for prioritising the processes. A real-life application is presented, which adopts APQC Process Identification Framework, Fuzzy-SWARA for weighting the criteria, and six additional methods for prioritising the processes. The approach would assist the executives in maintaining the BPM lifecycle by presenting a roadmap, especially for organisations that do not have much experience in this field. Methodological depth, richness and recency would provide guidelines for investigating the best set of processes to include in the architecture initially, not in the analysis or redesign phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":45876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcda.1798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aims to develop a pipeline for identifying and prioritising the processes to include in business process management (BPM) initiatives by considering the obstacles for giving equal importance to the processes performed in businesses. The paper proposes the use of a process classification framework as a reference for process identification and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods for prioritising the processes. A real-life application is presented, which adopts APQC Process Identification Framework, Fuzzy-SWARA for weighting the criteria, and six additional methods for prioritising the processes. The approach would assist the executives in maintaining the BPM lifecycle by presenting a roadmap, especially for organisations that do not have much experience in this field. Methodological depth, richness and recency would provide guidelines for investigating the best set of processes to include in the architecture initially, not in the analysis or redesign phases.

确定过程组合并确定优先级,以维持有效的业务过程管理生命周期
本研究旨在通过考虑对业务中执行的流程给予同等重要性的障碍,开发用于识别流程并对其进行优先级排序的管道,以包含在业务流程管理(BPM)计划中。本文提出使用过程分类框架作为过程识别的参考,并采用模糊多准则决策方法对过程进行优先排序。给出了一个实际应用,该应用采用APQC过程识别框架,模糊- swara加权标准,以及六种附加方法来确定过程的优先级。该方法将通过提供路线图来帮助执行人员维护BPM生命周期,特别是对于在该领域没有太多经验的组织。方法学的深度、丰富性和近时性将提供指导方针,用于研究在体系结构初始阶段(而不是在分析或重新设计阶段)中包含的最佳过程集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis was launched in 1992, and from the outset has aimed to be the repository of choice for papers covering all aspects of MCDA/MCDM. The journal provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of all aspects of research, application and evaluation of multi-criteria decision analysis, and publishes material from a variety of disciplines and all schools of thought. Papers addressing mathematical, theoretical, and behavioural aspects are welcome, as are case studies, applications and evaluation of techniques and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信