Numerical investigation on ultra-high-lift low-pressure turbine cascade aerodynamics at low Reynolds numbers using transition-based turbulence models

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
Xiaole Wang, B. Cui, Zuoli Xiao
{"title":"Numerical investigation on ultra-high-lift low-pressure turbine cascade aerodynamics at low Reynolds numbers using transition-based turbulence models","authors":"Xiaole Wang, B. Cui, Zuoli Xiao","doi":"10.1080/14685248.2020.1849712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The performance of ultra-high-lift (UHL) low-pressure turbine (LPT) is subject to complex flow phenomena (e.g. separation, transition and reattachment) which require advanced modelling for accurate numerical predictions. The feasibility and fidelity of three widely used transition-based turbulence models are evaluated in the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) prediction of low-Reynolds number flows in linear UHL LPT cascade (T106C). All three transition models prove to capture the tendency that the size of separation bubble decreases with the increase of Reynolds number or inlet turbulence intensity. It turns out that intermittency factor-transition momentum thickness Reynolds number based shear stress transport turbulence model is the most accurate among the three models, expect for the clean inlet case at an isentropic outlet Reynolds number of . It is suggested that different viscosity ratios should be prescribed at the inlet for various models to mimic the effect of turbulence intensities precisely. In order to take into account the periodic wakes in computation, a moving cylindrical bar is added to the cascade inlet. The assessment of the capability of three models in predicting unsteady wake induced transition is carried out for selected Reynolds numbers. Some practical suggestions are given for the use of transition models based on RANS equations in simulation of the ultra-high-lift LPT cascade flows at low Reynolds numbers.","PeriodicalId":49967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Turbulence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14685248.2020.1849712","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Turbulence","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14685248.2020.1849712","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The performance of ultra-high-lift (UHL) low-pressure turbine (LPT) is subject to complex flow phenomena (e.g. separation, transition and reattachment) which require advanced modelling for accurate numerical predictions. The feasibility and fidelity of three widely used transition-based turbulence models are evaluated in the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) prediction of low-Reynolds number flows in linear UHL LPT cascade (T106C). All three transition models prove to capture the tendency that the size of separation bubble decreases with the increase of Reynolds number or inlet turbulence intensity. It turns out that intermittency factor-transition momentum thickness Reynolds number based shear stress transport turbulence model is the most accurate among the three models, expect for the clean inlet case at an isentropic outlet Reynolds number of . It is suggested that different viscosity ratios should be prescribed at the inlet for various models to mimic the effect of turbulence intensities precisely. In order to take into account the periodic wakes in computation, a moving cylindrical bar is added to the cascade inlet. The assessment of the capability of three models in predicting unsteady wake induced transition is carried out for selected Reynolds numbers. Some practical suggestions are given for the use of transition models based on RANS equations in simulation of the ultra-high-lift LPT cascade flows at low Reynolds numbers.
基于过渡的湍流模型对低雷诺数下超高升力低压涡轮叶栅气动特性的数值研究
摘要超高升程(UHL)低压涡轮机(LPT)的性能受到复杂流动现象(如分离、过渡和再附着)的影响,需要先进的建模才能进行准确的数值预测。在雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)预测超高压低雷诺数线性叶栅(T106C)中,评估了三种广泛使用的基于过渡的湍流模型的可行性和保真度。三个过渡模型都证明了分离气泡尺寸随雷诺数或入口湍流强度的增加而减小的趋势。结果表明,基于雷诺数的剪切应力输运湍流模型是三种模型中最准确的,除了等熵出口雷诺数为的清洁入口情况。建议在各种模型的入口处规定不同的粘度比,以精确模拟湍流强度的影响。为了在计算中考虑周期尾流,在叶栅入口处增加了一个移动的圆柱杆。针对选定的雷诺数,对三个模型预测非定常尾流诱导过渡的能力进行了评估。对基于RANS方程的过渡模型在低雷诺数超高升程LPT叶栅流动模拟中的应用提出了一些实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Turbulence
Journal of Turbulence 物理-力学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Turbulence is a physical phenomenon occurring in most fluid flows, and is a major research topic at the cutting edge of science and technology. Journal of Turbulence ( JoT) is a digital forum for disseminating new theoretical, numerical and experimental knowledge aimed at understanding, predicting and controlling fluid turbulence. JoT provides a common venue for communicating advances of fundamental and applied character across the many disciplines in which turbulence plays a vital role. Examples include turbulence arising in engineering fluid dynamics (aerodynamics and hydrodynamics, particulate and multi-phase flows, acoustics, hydraulics, combustion, aeroelasticity, transitional flows, turbo-machinery, heat transfer), geophysical fluid dynamics (environmental flows, oceanography, meteorology), in physics (magnetohydrodynamics and fusion, astrophysics, cryogenic and quantum fluids), and mathematics (turbulence from PDE’s, model systems). The multimedia capabilities offered by this electronic journal (including free colour images and video movies), provide a unique opportunity for disseminating turbulence research in visually impressive ways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信