Optimizing Adjuvant Radiation Planning Outcomes in Patients with Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer

M. Alhefny, Hany S. Attallah, Mahmoud Abdallah, A. Yassin, Khaled M. El-Shahat, A. Obaya
{"title":"Optimizing Adjuvant Radiation Planning Outcomes in Patients with Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer","authors":"M. Alhefny, Hany S. Attallah, Mahmoud Abdallah, A. Yassin, Khaled M. El-Shahat, A. Obaya","doi":"10.4236/abcr.2021.103009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed \nworldwide, synchronous bilateral breast cancer accounts for unique entity of the disease, particularly \npost-operative radiotherapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer (SBBC) is \nchallenging with lack of evidence about \nthe best irradiation technique. In this study, we tried to explore the optimum radiotherapy \ntechnique regarding the dosimetric parameters. Methods: We recruited 15 \nSBBC patients in whom post-operative radiotherapy was indicated and we established three plans for each patient \nusing 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT, and then we \ncompared the three plans as regard target volume coverage parameters and organs \nat risk (OAR) doses. Results: We found that PTV coverage parameter was \nsuperior with IMRT compared with 3DCRT and VMAT in terms of Dmean (p = 0.001), \nD95% (p = 0.001), Dmax (p = 0.0001), conformity index (p = 0.0001) and \nHI (p = 0.0001). Doses to OAR were not significantly different between the three \ntechniques in cardiac dose and LAD \nmaximum dose, but 3DCRT was superior in LAD mean dose (p = 0.03) and lung \nvolume receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 10 Gy (V10) (p = 0.0001), but this difference \nwas non-significant between 3DCRT and IMRT (p = 0.4 and 0.06 respectively), \nwhile VMAT led to the highest doses to LAD and lung. Conclusions: IMRT \nshowed the best target coverage parameters in post-operative radiotherapy for \nSBBC compared with 3DCRT and VMAT. For OAR doses IMRT showed comparable results \nwith 3DCRT, while VMAT delivered a \nsignificantly higher dose to OAR.","PeriodicalId":67095,"journal":{"name":"乳腺癌(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"乳腺癌(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2021.103009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed worldwide, synchronous bilateral breast cancer accounts for unique entity of the disease, particularly post-operative radiotherapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer (SBBC) is challenging with lack of evidence about the best irradiation technique. In this study, we tried to explore the optimum radiotherapy technique regarding the dosimetric parameters. Methods: We recruited 15 SBBC patients in whom post-operative radiotherapy was indicated and we established three plans for each patient using 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT, and then we compared the three plans as regard target volume coverage parameters and organs at risk (OAR) doses. Results: We found that PTV coverage parameter was superior with IMRT compared with 3DCRT and VMAT in terms of Dmean (p = 0.001), D95% (p = 0.001), Dmax (p = 0.0001), conformity index (p = 0.0001) and HI (p = 0.0001). Doses to OAR were not significantly different between the three techniques in cardiac dose and LAD maximum dose, but 3DCRT was superior in LAD mean dose (p = 0.03) and lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 10 Gy (V10) (p = 0.0001), but this difference was non-significant between 3DCRT and IMRT (p = 0.4 and 0.06 respectively), while VMAT led to the highest doses to LAD and lung. Conclusions: IMRT showed the best target coverage parameters in post-operative radiotherapy for SBBC compared with 3DCRT and VMAT. For OAR doses IMRT showed comparable results with 3DCRT, while VMAT delivered a significantly higher dose to OAR.
同步双侧癌症患者辅助放射计划结果的优化
背景:癌症是世界上诊断出的最常见的癌症,同步双侧癌症是该疾病的独特实体,尤其是同步双侧癌症(SBBC)的术后放射治疗具有挑战性,缺乏最佳放射治疗技术的证据。在本研究中,我们试图探索关于剂量测定参数的最佳放射治疗技术。方法:我们招募了15名需要术后放疗的SBBC患者,并使用3DCRT、IMRT和VMAT为每位患者制定了三个计划,然后在靶体积覆盖参数和危险器官(OAR)剂量方面比较了这三个计划。结果:与3DCRT和VMAT相比,IMRT的PTV覆盖参数在Dmean(p=0.001)、D95%(p=0.001,但3DCRT在接受20Gy(V20)和10Gy(V10)的LAD平均剂量(p=0.003)和肺容量(p=0.0001)方面优于IMRT(分别为p=0.04和0.06),而VMAT导致LAD和肺的最高剂量。结论:与3DCRT和VMAT相比,IMRT在SBBC术后放疗中显示出最佳的靶点覆盖参数。对于OAR剂量,IMRT显示出与3DCRT相当的结果,而VMAT向OAR提供了显著更高的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信