M. Alhefny, Hany S. Attallah, Mahmoud Abdallah, A. Yassin, Khaled M. El-Shahat, A. Obaya
{"title":"Optimizing Adjuvant Radiation Planning Outcomes in Patients with Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer","authors":"M. Alhefny, Hany S. Attallah, Mahmoud Abdallah, A. Yassin, Khaled M. El-Shahat, A. Obaya","doi":"10.4236/abcr.2021.103009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed \nworldwide, synchronous bilateral breast cancer accounts for unique entity of the disease, particularly \npost-operative radiotherapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer (SBBC) is \nchallenging with lack of evidence about \nthe best irradiation technique. In this study, we tried to explore the optimum radiotherapy \ntechnique regarding the dosimetric parameters. Methods: We recruited 15 \nSBBC patients in whom post-operative radiotherapy was indicated and we established three plans for each patient \nusing 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT, and then we \ncompared the three plans as regard target volume coverage parameters and organs \nat risk (OAR) doses. Results: We found that PTV coverage parameter was \nsuperior with IMRT compared with 3DCRT and VMAT in terms of Dmean (p = 0.001), \nD95% (p = 0.001), Dmax (p = 0.0001), conformity index (p = 0.0001) and \nHI (p = 0.0001). Doses to OAR were not significantly different between the three \ntechniques in cardiac dose and LAD \nmaximum dose, but 3DCRT was superior in LAD mean dose (p = 0.03) and lung \nvolume receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 10 Gy (V10) (p = 0.0001), but this difference \nwas non-significant between 3DCRT and IMRT (p = 0.4 and 0.06 respectively), \nwhile VMAT led to the highest doses to LAD and lung. Conclusions: IMRT \nshowed the best target coverage parameters in post-operative radiotherapy for \nSBBC compared with 3DCRT and VMAT. For OAR doses IMRT showed comparable results \nwith 3DCRT, while VMAT delivered a \nsignificantly higher dose to OAR.","PeriodicalId":67095,"journal":{"name":"乳腺癌(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"乳腺癌(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2021.103009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed
worldwide, synchronous bilateral breast cancer accounts for unique entity of the disease, particularly
post-operative radiotherapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer (SBBC) is
challenging with lack of evidence about
the best irradiation technique. In this study, we tried to explore the optimum radiotherapy
technique regarding the dosimetric parameters. Methods: We recruited 15
SBBC patients in whom post-operative radiotherapy was indicated and we established three plans for each patient
using 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT, and then we
compared the three plans as regard target volume coverage parameters and organs
at risk (OAR) doses. Results: We found that PTV coverage parameter was
superior with IMRT compared with 3DCRT and VMAT in terms of Dmean (p = 0.001),
D95% (p = 0.001), Dmax (p = 0.0001), conformity index (p = 0.0001) and
HI (p = 0.0001). Doses to OAR were not significantly different between the three
techniques in cardiac dose and LAD
maximum dose, but 3DCRT was superior in LAD mean dose (p = 0.03) and lung
volume receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 10 Gy (V10) (p = 0.0001), but this difference
was non-significant between 3DCRT and IMRT (p = 0.4 and 0.06 respectively),
while VMAT led to the highest doses to LAD and lung. Conclusions: IMRT
showed the best target coverage parameters in post-operative radiotherapy for
SBBC compared with 3DCRT and VMAT. For OAR doses IMRT showed comparable results
with 3DCRT, while VMAT delivered a
significantly higher dose to OAR.