Differences in the Situational Parameters of Tennis Matches Between Winners and Losers in the Women’s Main Draw Competition at ROLAND GARROS 2022

Q4 Social Sciences

Studia Sportiva Pub Date : 2023-02-24 DOI:10.5817/sts2022-2-5

Zlatan Bilić

{"title":"Differences in the Situational Parameters of Tennis Matches Between Winners and Losers in the Women’s Main Draw Competition at ROLAND GARROS 2022","authors":"Zlatan Bilić","doi":"10.5817/sts2022-2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies investigated the situational efficiency parameters at tennis matches in the men's and women's competition at previous Rolland Garros tournaments. The aim of this study was to determine if there are differences in the situational efficiency parameters between winners and losers in the women's main draw competition at Roland Garros 2022. This study included 125 main draw matches. Differences in performance were analysed across 7 situational efficiency variables: aces, double faults, 1st serve average speed, 2nd serve average speed, winners, unforced errors and forced errors. The results showed significant differences between winners and losers with the following parameters on the winners’ side: number of aces per match (2.40/1.63; p = 0.03), winners (24.83/19.37; p = 0.00), unforced errors (23.80/29.13; p = 0.00) and forced errors (19.71/23.64; p = 0.00). The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences in double faults, 1st serve average speed and 2nd serve average speed. More aces of winners can indicate better service accuracy and variability, as there is no significant difference in service speed. Also, a more successful start of a point can positively affect the early dominance in the point rally and easier achieving of winners. In addition to all the above, it is notable that more successful tennis players, as well as having more winners, record less unforced and forced errors. The information obtained should be used by tennis coaches in planning trainings and preparing matches in order for their tennis players to achieve maximum results. \nKeywords: tennis, efficiency, match statistics","PeriodicalId":36179,"journal":{"name":"Studia Sportiva","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Sportiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/sts2022-2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies investigated the situational efficiency parameters at tennis matches in the men's and women's competition at previous Rolland Garros tournaments. The aim of this study was to determine if there are differences in the situational efficiency parameters between winners and losers in the women's main draw competition at Roland Garros 2022. This study included 125 main draw matches. Differences in performance were analysed across 7 situational efficiency variables: aces, double faults, 1st serve average speed, 2nd serve average speed, winners, unforced errors and forced errors. The results showed significant differences between winners and losers with the following parameters on the winners’ side: number of aces per match (2.40/1.63; p = 0.03), winners (24.83/19.37; p = 0.00), unforced errors (23.80/29.13; p = 0.00) and forced errors (19.71/23.64; p = 0.00). The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences in double faults, 1st serve average speed and 2nd serve average speed. More aces of winners can indicate better service accuracy and variability, as there is no significant difference in service speed. Also, a more successful start of a point can positively affect the early dominance in the point rally and easier achieving of winners. In addition to all the above, it is notable that more successful tennis players, as well as having more winners, record less unforced and forced errors. The information obtained should be used by tennis coaches in planning trainings and preparing matches in order for their tennis players to achieve maximum results. Keywords: tennis, efficiency, match statistics

查看原文本刊更多论文

2022年罗兰加洛斯网球女单主抽签比赛胜负态势参数差异研究

有几项研究调查了历届罗兰加洛斯锦标赛男子和女子网球比赛中的情境效率参数。本研究的目的是确定在2022年罗兰加洛斯女子主平局比赛中，赢家和输家之间的情境效率参数是否存在差异。本研究包括125场主要抽签比赛。分析了7个情境效率变量的表现差异:ace、双误、1发平均速度、2发平均速度、制胜球、非受迫性失误和受迫性失误。结果显示，赢家和输家在以下参数方面存在显著差异:每场比赛的ace数(2.40/1.63;P = 0.03)，获胜者(24.83/19.37;P = 0.00)，非强制误差(23.80/29.13;P = 0.00)和强制误差(19.71/23.64;P = 0.00)。结果表明，两队在双误、一发球平均速度和二发球平均速度上均无显著差异。赢球者的a越多，发球的准确性和可变性就越好，因为发球速度没有显著差异。此外，一个更成功的开局可以积极影响在积分集会中的早期统治地位，并更容易获得冠军。除此之外，值得注意的是，更成功的网球运动员，以及更多的赢家，记录更少的非受迫性和受迫性失误。获得的信息应被网球教练用于规划训练和准备比赛，以使他们的网球运动员取得最大的成绩。关键词:网球，效率，比赛统计

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studia Sportiva Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量