O. Rusakov, V. Starostenko, I. Pashkevich, R. Kutas
{"title":"Contrasting lithospheric geophysical structure of the Black Sea subbasins: Relevance to testing geotectonic models for this mega depression","authors":"O. Rusakov, V. Starostenko, I. Pashkevich, R. Kutas","doi":"10.24028/gj.v45i1.275178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an integrated analysis of the geophysical parameters of the lithosphere of Black Sea basin obtained as a result of the interpretation of magnetic, gravity, thermal, deep seismic sounding and seismic-tomographic data. It first demonstrates inherent significant differences in geophysical parameters of lithosphere in the Western and Eastern Black Sea subbasins existing from the prerift stage. The set of reviewed parameters responsible for formation of the present-day lithosphere includes types of crust, depths to acoustic basement, configuration of subbasins, depths to Moho, heat flow and relief of the thermal-asthenosphere boundary (LAB), trends of main deep faults of the crystalline crust, their kinematic types, occurring linear magnetic anomalies, velocity pattern of subcrustal mantle. The above-mentioned parameters of the lithosphere are indicators of the age, geodynamics and driving mechanisms for opening of a subbasins. Oblique trends of the subbasins and the topography of Moho discontinuity in the west and east domains, oblique striking of pre-rifting Istanbul zone and the Shatsky Ridge and different trends of deep faults in the crystalline crust suggest distinct lithospheric structure existing from pre-opening of the Black Sea subbasins and different geodynamical conditions of its formation. The Odesa-Sinop-Ordu deep fault zone as a direct continuation of the Golovanivskaya suture zone of the Ukrainian shield and its slope, probably is of the Precambrian age. So it could be the tectonic boundary between two segments of pre-rift continental crust and between future subbasins. The examples illustrate how indicated parameters of the lithosphere can geophysically confirm the basic ideas of available models for geodynamics of the Black Sea.","PeriodicalId":54141,"journal":{"name":"Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal-Geophysical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofizicheskiy Zhurnal-Geophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24028/gj.v45i1.275178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We present an integrated analysis of the geophysical parameters of the lithosphere of Black Sea basin obtained as a result of the interpretation of magnetic, gravity, thermal, deep seismic sounding and seismic-tomographic data. It first demonstrates inherent significant differences in geophysical parameters of lithosphere in the Western and Eastern Black Sea subbasins existing from the prerift stage. The set of reviewed parameters responsible for formation of the present-day lithosphere includes types of crust, depths to acoustic basement, configuration of subbasins, depths to Moho, heat flow and relief of the thermal-asthenosphere boundary (LAB), trends of main deep faults of the crystalline crust, their kinematic types, occurring linear magnetic anomalies, velocity pattern of subcrustal mantle. The above-mentioned parameters of the lithosphere are indicators of the age, geodynamics and driving mechanisms for opening of a subbasins. Oblique trends of the subbasins and the topography of Moho discontinuity in the west and east domains, oblique striking of pre-rifting Istanbul zone and the Shatsky Ridge and different trends of deep faults in the crystalline crust suggest distinct lithospheric structure existing from pre-opening of the Black Sea subbasins and different geodynamical conditions of its formation. The Odesa-Sinop-Ordu deep fault zone as a direct continuation of the Golovanivskaya suture zone of the Ukrainian shield and its slope, probably is of the Precambrian age. So it could be the tectonic boundary between two segments of pre-rift continental crust and between future subbasins. The examples illustrate how indicated parameters of the lithosphere can geophysically confirm the basic ideas of available models for geodynamics of the Black Sea.
我们对通过磁、重力、热、深地震测深和地震层析成像数据的解释获得的黑海盆地岩石圈的地球物理参数进行了综合分析。它首先证明了从预抬升阶段开始存在的黑海西部和东部次盆地岩石圈地球物理参数的内在显著差异。负责现今岩石圈形成的一组已审查的参数包括地壳类型、声学基底深度、次盆地构造、莫霍面深度、热软流圈边界(LAB)的热流和起伏、结晶地壳主要深部断层的趋势、它们的运动学类型、发生的线性磁异常,地壳下地幔的速度模式。岩石圈的上述参数是时代、地球动力学和次盆地打开驱动机制的指标。西域和东域的次盆地的倾斜趋势和莫霍不连续地形、裂谷前伊斯坦布尔带和沙茨基山脊的倾斜走向以及结晶地壳中深层断层的不同趋势表明,黑海次盆地开放前存在着不同的岩石圈结构,其形成的地球动力学条件也不同。Odesa Sinop Ordu深层断裂带是乌克兰地盾及其斜坡的Golovanivskaya缝合带的直接延续,可能属于前寒武纪。因此,它可能是裂谷前大陆地壳两段之间以及未来次盆地之间的构造边界。这些例子说明了岩石圈的指示参数如何在地球物理上证实黑海地球动力学可用模型的基本思想。