Collaborative technology and motivations: utilization, value and gamification

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
G. S. Adornes, Raquel Muñiz
{"title":"Collaborative technology and motivations: utilization, value and gamification","authors":"G. S. Adornes, Raquel Muñiz","doi":"10.1108/INMR-04-2019-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nInstigated by the trend of collaborative economics, taking into consideration the particularities pointed out by Simis (2015), such as a new social, economic and technological scenario, this paper aims to identify which factors serve as motivators for collaboration among the technologies of this scenario.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this paper, the authors analyzed Waze, an application that works based on traffic information made available by the users of the platform. For the development of this qualitative work, aspects that served as the basis for the interview script applied were classified into three different categories: utilization, personal values and gamification; the latter being an important aspect for collaboration in the application in question. Two distinct groups were interviewed; one of regular users of Waze, and the other of advanced users, who also work voluntarily in the maintenance of the app.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that personal values are determinant factors for both groups; however, there are distinct incentives for the different users interviewed, like reciprocity, altruism and empathy. The first one is an important aspect to share information by the regular users, while the other ones are characteristics advanced users.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study presents some limitations in terms of the restricted group and focus on only one of the many collaborative technological social, as well as lacking on-site analysis of the use of Waze.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis is a valid research when taking into consideration studies that approach the app Waze, as the issues explored in this paper are new in the academic studies considering previous app’s analyses that are related to functionality.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe results presented in this study help to understand the current relationship between sharing economy and the technology provided to those who use these platforms.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research opens the horizon for future studies applied on other collaborative technological user platforms, to see if the results would be similar and construct a user journey in relation to information sharing through experimental monitoring.\n","PeriodicalId":42220,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/INMR-04-2019-0056","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-04-2019-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose Instigated by the trend of collaborative economics, taking into consideration the particularities pointed out by Simis (2015), such as a new social, economic and technological scenario, this paper aims to identify which factors serve as motivators for collaboration among the technologies of this scenario. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, the authors analyzed Waze, an application that works based on traffic information made available by the users of the platform. For the development of this qualitative work, aspects that served as the basis for the interview script applied were classified into three different categories: utilization, personal values and gamification; the latter being an important aspect for collaboration in the application in question. Two distinct groups were interviewed; one of regular users of Waze, and the other of advanced users, who also work voluntarily in the maintenance of the app. Findings The results indicate that personal values are determinant factors for both groups; however, there are distinct incentives for the different users interviewed, like reciprocity, altruism and empathy. The first one is an important aspect to share information by the regular users, while the other ones are characteristics advanced users. Research limitations/implications The study presents some limitations in terms of the restricted group and focus on only one of the many collaborative technological social, as well as lacking on-site analysis of the use of Waze. Practical implications This is a valid research when taking into consideration studies that approach the app Waze, as the issues explored in this paper are new in the academic studies considering previous app’s analyses that are related to functionality. Social implications The results presented in this study help to understand the current relationship between sharing economy and the technology provided to those who use these platforms. Originality/value This research opens the horizon for future studies applied on other collaborative technological user platforms, to see if the results would be similar and construct a user journey in relation to information sharing through experimental monitoring.
协作技术和动机:利用、价值和游戏化
在协作经济学趋势的推动下,考虑到Simis(2015)指出的特殊性,例如新的社会、经济和技术场景,本文旨在确定哪些因素是该场景中技术之间协作的激励因素。设计/方法/方法在本文中,作者分析了Waze,一个基于平台用户提供的交通信息的应用程序。为了开展这一定性工作,作为应用访谈脚本基础的方面被分为三种不同的类别:利用、个人价值和游戏化;后者是应用程序中协作的一个重要方面。采访了两组不同的人;一组是Waze的普通用户,另一组是高级用户,他们也自愿参与该应用的维护工作。研究结果表明,个人价值观是两组用户的决定因素;然而,对于不同的受访用户来说,有不同的动机,比如互惠、利他和同理心。前者是普通用户共享信息的重要方面,后者是高级用户的特征。研究的局限性/启示:该研究在受限制的群体方面存在一些局限性,并且只关注了许多协作技术社会中的一种,并且缺乏对Waze使用的现场分析。实际意义考虑到对Waze应用程序的研究,这是一项有效的研究,因为本文探讨的问题在学术研究中是新的,考虑到之前的应用程序分析与功能相关。社会意义本研究的结果有助于理解共享经济与提供给使用这些平台的人的技术之间的关系。原创性/价值本研究为未来应用于其他协同技术用户平台的研究开辟了视野,通过实验监测,观察结果是否相似,并构建与信息共享相关的用户旅程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信