In Defense of the Map Library

IF 0.3 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Marcy Bidney, N. Piekielek
{"title":"In Defense of the Map Library","authors":"Marcy Bidney, N. Piekielek","doi":"10.1080/15420353.2018.1514856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the value of print map collections around the world has come into question resulting in the closure and consolidation of many map libraries and their collections (Keller 2001; Andrew and Weimer 2016). The justification for these closures is often that “print maps are no longer relevant in a digital world.” In this editorial, we (Marcy and Nathan) take this opportunity to introduce ourselves to the readership of the Taylor & Francis Journal of Map & Geography Libraries (hereafter “JMGL”), by outlining four major ways we feel that map libraries and the print cartographic collections that they preserve remain relevant and irreplaceable even in a digital world. There are likely other ways that map libraries and their collections remain relevant today and we invite you, the authors and readers of this journal, to contribute your own ideas and writing on the topic in future issues. In our view, there is a dearth of formal writing and scholarship in response to map library closures and if not in this journal, then where would one look for sound reasoning and justification to keep them open? The Oxford English Dictionary defines a map as a “drawing or other representation of the earth’s surface or a part of it made on a flat surface, showing the distribution of physical or geographic features (and often also including socio-economic, political, agricultural, meteorological, etc. information), with each point in the representation corresponding to an actual geographical position according to a fixed scale or projection; a similar representation of the positions of the stars in the sky, the surface of the planet, or the like.” For the purposes of this editorial, we refer to “maps” generically to also include the other print cartographic resources often housed in map libraries like atlases, globes, historic aerial photographs, and others. Print maps (and other print cartographic resources) are often the authoritative geographic and scientific documents of their time, accurately","PeriodicalId":54009,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Map & Geography Libraries","volume":"14 1","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15420353.2018.1514856","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Map & Geography Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2018.1514856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In recent years, the value of print map collections around the world has come into question resulting in the closure and consolidation of many map libraries and their collections (Keller 2001; Andrew and Weimer 2016). The justification for these closures is often that “print maps are no longer relevant in a digital world.” In this editorial, we (Marcy and Nathan) take this opportunity to introduce ourselves to the readership of the Taylor & Francis Journal of Map & Geography Libraries (hereafter “JMGL”), by outlining four major ways we feel that map libraries and the print cartographic collections that they preserve remain relevant and irreplaceable even in a digital world. There are likely other ways that map libraries and their collections remain relevant today and we invite you, the authors and readers of this journal, to contribute your own ideas and writing on the topic in future issues. In our view, there is a dearth of formal writing and scholarship in response to map library closures and if not in this journal, then where would one look for sound reasoning and justification to keep them open? The Oxford English Dictionary defines a map as a “drawing or other representation of the earth’s surface or a part of it made on a flat surface, showing the distribution of physical or geographic features (and often also including socio-economic, political, agricultural, meteorological, etc. information), with each point in the representation corresponding to an actual geographical position according to a fixed scale or projection; a similar representation of the positions of the stars in the sky, the surface of the planet, or the like.” For the purposes of this editorial, we refer to “maps” generically to also include the other print cartographic resources often housed in map libraries like atlases, globes, historic aerial photographs, and others. Print maps (and other print cartographic resources) are often the authoritative geographic and scientific documents of their time, accurately
为地图库辩护
近年来,世界各地印刷地图收藏的价值受到质疑,导致许多地图图书馆及其收藏的关闭和合并(Keller 2001;Andrew and Weimer 2016)。这些关闭的理由通常是“印刷地图在数字世界中不再相关”。在这篇社论中,我们(Marcy和Nathan)借此机会向《泰勒和弗朗西斯地图与地理图书馆杂志》(以下简称“JMGL”)的读者介绍我们自己,概述了我们认为地图图书馆及其保存的印刷地图馆藏即使在数字世界中仍然具有相关性和不可替代性的四种主要方式。可能还有其他方式使地图图书馆及其馆藏在今天保持相关性,我们邀请您,本杂志的作者和读者,在未来的问题中就这一主题提供您自己的想法和写作。在我们看来,关于地图图书馆关闭的回应缺乏正式的写作和学术研究,如果不在这本杂志上,那么人们将在哪里寻找合理的理由和理由来保持它们的开放?《牛津英语词典》对地图的定义是:“在平面上绘制地球表面或地球表面的一部分,显示物理或地理特征的分布(通常还包括社会经济、政治、农业、气象等信息),根据固定的比例尺或投影,图中的每个点对应一个实际的地理位置;恒星在天空中的位置、行星表面或类似物体的类似表现。”出于这篇社论的目的,我们一般指的“地图”也包括其他印刷地图资源,如地图册、地球仪、历史航空照片等。印刷地图(和其他印刷地图资源)通常是他们那个时代的权威地理和科学文献,准确无误
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Map & Geography Libraries
Journal of Map & Geography Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
83.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Journal of Map & Geography Libraries is a multidisciplinary publication that covers international research and information on the production, procurement, processing, and utilization of geographic and cartographic materials and geospatial information. Papers submitted undergo a rigorous peer-review process by professors, researchers, and practicing librarians with a passion for geography, cartographic materials, and the mapping and spatial sciences. The journal accepts original theory-based, case study, and practical papers that substantially advance an understanding of the mapping sciences in all of its forms to support users of map and geospatial collections, archives, and similar institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信