Assessment of the growth in social groups for sustainable agriculture and land management

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. Pretty, S. Attwood, R. Bawden, Henk van den Berg, Z. Bharucha, J. Dixon, Cornelia Butler Flora, K. Gallagher, K. Genskow, Sue E. Hartley, J. Ketelaar, J. Kiara, Vijay Kumar, Yuelai Lu, T. Macmillan, A. Maréchal, Alma Linda Morales-Abubakar, A. Noble, P. V. Vara Prasad, E. Rametsteiner, J. Reganold, Jacob I. Ricks, J. Rockström, O. Saito, P. Thorne, Songliang Wang, Hannah Wittman, M. Winter, Puyun Yang
{"title":"Assessment of the growth in social groups for sustainable agriculture and land management","authors":"J. Pretty, S. Attwood, R. Bawden, Henk van den Berg, Z. Bharucha, J. Dixon, Cornelia Butler Flora, K. Gallagher, K. Genskow, Sue E. Hartley, J. Ketelaar, J. Kiara, Vijay Kumar, Yuelai Lu, T. Macmillan, A. Maréchal, Alma Linda Morales-Abubakar, A. Noble, P. V. Vara Prasad, E. Rametsteiner, J. Reganold, Jacob I. Ricks, J. Rockström, O. Saito, P. Thorne, Songliang Wang, Hannah Wittman, M. Winter, Puyun Yang","doi":"10.1017/sus.2020.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-technical summary Until the past half-century, all agriculture and land management was framed by local institutions strong in social capital. But neoliberal forms of development came to undermine existing structures, thus reducing sustainability and equity. The past 20 years, though, have seen the deliberate establishment of more than 8 million new social groups across the world. This restructuring and growth of rural social capital within specific territories is leading to increased productivity of agricultural and land management systems, with particular benefits for those previously excluded. Further growth would occur with more national and regional policy support. Technical summary For agriculture and land management to improve natural capital over whole landscapes, social cooperation has long been required. The political economy of the later twentieth and early twenty-first centuries prioritized unfettered individual action over the collective, and many rural institutions were harmed or destroyed. Since then, a wide range of social movements, networks and federations have emerged to support transitions towards sustainability and equity. Here, we focus on social capital manifested as intentionally formed collaborative groups within specific geographic territories. These groups focus on: (1) integrated pest management; (2) forests; (3) land; (4) water; (5) pastures; (6) support services; (7) innovation platforms; and (8) small-scale systems. We show across 122 initiatives in 55 countries that the number of groups has grown from 0.50 million (in 2000) to 8.54 million (in 2020). The area of land transformed by the 170–255 million group members is 300 Mha, mostly in less-developed countries (98% groups; 94% area). Farmers and land managers working with scientists and extensionists in these groups have improved both environmental outcomes and agricultural productivity. In some cases, changes to national or regional policy supported this growth in groups. Together with other movements, these social groups could now support further transitions towards policies and behaviours for global sustainability. Social media summary Millions of geographically based new social groups are leading to more sustainable agriculture and forestry worldwide.","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/sus.2020.19","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

Non-technical summary Until the past half-century, all agriculture and land management was framed by local institutions strong in social capital. But neoliberal forms of development came to undermine existing structures, thus reducing sustainability and equity. The past 20 years, though, have seen the deliberate establishment of more than 8 million new social groups across the world. This restructuring and growth of rural social capital within specific territories is leading to increased productivity of agricultural and land management systems, with particular benefits for those previously excluded. Further growth would occur with more national and regional policy support. Technical summary For agriculture and land management to improve natural capital over whole landscapes, social cooperation has long been required. The political economy of the later twentieth and early twenty-first centuries prioritized unfettered individual action over the collective, and many rural institutions were harmed or destroyed. Since then, a wide range of social movements, networks and federations have emerged to support transitions towards sustainability and equity. Here, we focus on social capital manifested as intentionally formed collaborative groups within specific geographic territories. These groups focus on: (1) integrated pest management; (2) forests; (3) land; (4) water; (5) pastures; (6) support services; (7) innovation platforms; and (8) small-scale systems. We show across 122 initiatives in 55 countries that the number of groups has grown from 0.50 million (in 2000) to 8.54 million (in 2020). The area of land transformed by the 170–255 million group members is 300 Mha, mostly in less-developed countries (98% groups; 94% area). Farmers and land managers working with scientists and extensionists in these groups have improved both environmental outcomes and agricultural productivity. In some cases, changes to national or regional policy supported this growth in groups. Together with other movements, these social groups could now support further transitions towards policies and behaviours for global sustainability. Social media summary Millions of geographically based new social groups are leading to more sustainable agriculture and forestry worldwide.
评估促进可持续农业和土地管理的社会群体的增长情况
非技术性总结在过去的半个世纪里,所有的农业和土地管理都是由具有强大社会资本的地方机构制定的。但新自由主义形式的发展开始破坏现有结构,从而降低了可持续性和公平性。然而,在过去的20年里,全世界蓄意建立了800多万个新的社会团体。农村社会资本在特定地区的重组和增长,提高了农业和土地管理系统的生产力,为以前被排除在外的人带来了特别的好处。如果有更多的国家和区域政策支持,经济将进一步增长。技术摘要为了提高整个景观的自然资本,农业和土地管理长期以来一直需要社会合作。二十世纪末和二十一世纪初的政治经济将不受约束的个人行动置于集体行动之上,许多农村机构受到损害或破坏。从那时起,出现了一系列支持向可持续性和公平过渡的社会运动、网络和联合会。在这里,我们关注的是社会资本,它表现为在特定地理区域内有意形成的合作群体。这些小组侧重于:(1)病虫害综合管理;(2) 森林;(3) 土地;(4) 水;(5) 牧场;(6) 支助服务;(7) 创新平台;和(8)小规模系统。我们在55个国家的122项倡议中表明,团体数量已从50万(2000年)增长到854万(2020年)。1.70-2.55亿集团成员改造的土地面积为3亿公顷,主要分布在欠发达国家(98%的集团;94%的面积)。农民和土地管理者与这些群体中的科学家和推广学家合作,改善了环境成果和农业生产力。在某些情况下,国家或区域政策的变化支持了群体的这种增长。这些社会团体现在可以与其他运动一道,支持进一步向全球可持续性政策和行为过渡。社交媒体摘要数以百万计的基于地理位置的新社会群体正在推动全球农业和林业的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信