Double Burden of Malnutrition Among Migrants and Refugees in Developed Countries

B. Akombi-Inyang, M. N. Huda, J. Byaruhanga, A. Renzaho
{"title":"Double Burden of Malnutrition Among Migrants and Refugees in Developed Countries","authors":"B. Akombi-Inyang, M. N. Huda, J. Byaruhanga, A. Renzaho","doi":"10.7565/SSP.V4.5394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The double burden of malnutrition (DBM) increases the risk of developing non-communicable diseases among migrant and refugee populations living in developed countries. This systematic review aims to examine the DBM among migrants and refugees in developed countries. It aims to appraise, synthesise, and summarise literature to create an evidence base that looks at multiple faces of DBM. \nMethods/Design: This protocol is informed by the standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A systematic review of peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies on DBM among migrants and refugees in developed countries will be undertaken. The review will include only studies published in English. Eight bibliographic databases will be searched: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, PubMed, and web of science. Grey literature will also be searched. Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be imported to Covidence. Screening for eligible studies will be conducted by two independent researchers. The quality of included studies will be appraised for risk of bias using validated tools. A narrative synthesis approach will be undertaken to report retrieved data. \nDiscussion: The protocol provides insight into the scope and parameters of the systematic review to be conducted.","PeriodicalId":74825,"journal":{"name":"Social science protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7565/SSP.V4.5394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The double burden of malnutrition (DBM) increases the risk of developing non-communicable diseases among migrant and refugee populations living in developed countries. This systematic review aims to examine the DBM among migrants and refugees in developed countries. It aims to appraise, synthesise, and summarise literature to create an evidence base that looks at multiple faces of DBM. Methods/Design: This protocol is informed by the standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A systematic review of peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies on DBM among migrants and refugees in developed countries will be undertaken. The review will include only studies published in English. Eight bibliographic databases will be searched: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, PubMed, and web of science. Grey literature will also be searched. Studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be imported to Covidence. Screening for eligible studies will be conducted by two independent researchers. The quality of included studies will be appraised for risk of bias using validated tools. A narrative synthesis approach will be undertaken to report retrieved data. Discussion: The protocol provides insight into the scope and parameters of the systematic review to be conducted.
发达国家移民和难民营养不良的双重负担
背景:营养不良的双重负担增加了生活在发达国家的移民和难民患非传染性疾病的风险。这项系统审查旨在审查发达国家移民和难民中的弱势群体问题。它旨在评估、综合和总结文献,以创建一个观察DBM多个方面的证据库。方法/设计:本方案遵循系统评价和荟萃分析方案(PRISMA-P)的标准首选报告项目指南。将对发达国家移民和难民DBM的同行评审定量、定性和混合方法研究进行系统审查。该综述将只包括以英语发表的研究。将搜索八个书目数据库:Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、ProQuest、Scopus、PubMed和web of science。灰色文献也将被搜索。符合纳入标准的研究将被导入Covidence。合格研究的筛选将由两名独立研究人员进行。纳入研究的质量将使用经过验证的工具评估偏倚风险。将采用叙述性综合方法报告检索到的数据。讨论:该方案深入了解了将要进行的系统审查的范围和参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信