Electrophysiological and psychophysical testing in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Shereen D. Hammer, R. Lasheen, M. Kotait, R. Amer
{"title":"Electrophysiological and psychophysical testing in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder","authors":"Shereen D. Hammer, R. Lasheen, M. Kotait, R. Amer","doi":"10.4103/ejpsy.ejpsy_12_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Multiple techniques are used for understanding, determining the real pathophysiological process, and treating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The aim of this study was to assess cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) as well as P300 in children with ADHD, and its correlation with neurocognitive tests [Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST), digit span (DS), and Stroop test (ST)]. Patients and methods A prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 103 children, who were divided into two groups: 53 children newly diagnosed with ADHD (according to Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed.), who were drug naïve, and 50 normal control matched for age, sex, educational and social level, and intelligence quotient. All participants had detailed psychiatric history, intelligence quotient Wechsler intelligence scale for children (WICS), Conners’ parent/teacher rating scale abbreviated form for ADHD, neuropsychological tests (WCST and Stroop), pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry using GSI 61 audiometer, immittance test using interacoustic, and sustained attention test using auditory continuous performance test (ACPT) P300. Results Children with ADHD had more perseverative responses, more preservative errors, and more failure to maintain set (FMS) than controls in WCST, with a significant difference among study groups. ADHD group was impaired in digit span backward and ST than control group. P300 amplitude and latency were significantly different between the study groups. In comparison with the control group, statistical delayed latencies of significance were observed in ADHD between all CAEP components. A significant difference for P1-N1 amplitude was observed among different components of CAEP, and no significance was observed regarding P2-N2 amplitude. ACPT showed a significant difference between both groups, with higher percentage in control group. Positive correlations were observed between P300 amplitude and WCST (perseverative error), P300 amplitude and ST results, and N2 latency and DS backward. Conclusion Assessment of CAEPs and P300 in children with ADHD, as well as their correlation with neurocognitive tests (WCST, DS, and ST), is crucial in diagnosis and management.","PeriodicalId":76626,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian journal of psychiatry : official journal of the Egyptian Psychiatric Association","volume":"42 1","pages":"139 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian journal of psychiatry : official journal of the Egyptian Psychiatric Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejpsy.ejpsy_12_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Multiple techniques are used for understanding, determining the real pathophysiological process, and treating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The aim of this study was to assess cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP) as well as P300 in children with ADHD, and its correlation with neurocognitive tests [Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST), digit span (DS), and Stroop test (ST)]. Patients and methods A prospective cross-sectional study was performed on 103 children, who were divided into two groups: 53 children newly diagnosed with ADHD (according to Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed.), who were drug naïve, and 50 normal control matched for age, sex, educational and social level, and intelligence quotient. All participants had detailed psychiatric history, intelligence quotient Wechsler intelligence scale for children (WICS), Conners’ parent/teacher rating scale abbreviated form for ADHD, neuropsychological tests (WCST and Stroop), pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry using GSI 61 audiometer, immittance test using interacoustic, and sustained attention test using auditory continuous performance test (ACPT) P300. Results Children with ADHD had more perseverative responses, more preservative errors, and more failure to maintain set (FMS) than controls in WCST, with a significant difference among study groups. ADHD group was impaired in digit span backward and ST than control group. P300 amplitude and latency were significantly different between the study groups. In comparison with the control group, statistical delayed latencies of significance were observed in ADHD between all CAEP components. A significant difference for P1-N1 amplitude was observed among different components of CAEP, and no significance was observed regarding P2-N2 amplitude. ACPT showed a significant difference between both groups, with higher percentage in control group. Positive correlations were observed between P300 amplitude and WCST (perseverative error), P300 amplitude and ST results, and N2 latency and DS backward. Conclusion Assessment of CAEPs and P300 in children with ADHD, as well as their correlation with neurocognitive tests (WCST, DS, and ST), is crucial in diagnosis and management.
注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的电生理和心理物理测试
背景:多种技术被用于理解、确定真正的病理生理过程和治疗注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)。本研究的目的是评估ADHD儿童皮层听觉诱发电位(CAEP)和P300及其与神经认知测试[威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)、数字广度(DS)和Stroop测验(ST)]的相关性。患者和方法对103名儿童进行前瞻性横断面研究,将其分为两组:53名新诊断为ADHD的儿童(根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版),药物naïve, 50名年龄、性别、文化社会水平、智商匹配的正常对照组。所有参与者均有详细的精神病史、儿童智商韦氏智力量表(WICS)、Conners ADHD家长/教师评定量表简写、神经心理测试(WCST和Stroop)、纯音测听、GSI 61语音测听、声间阻抗测试和听觉连续表现测试(ACPT) P300持续注意力测试。结果与对照组相比,ADHD患儿在WCST中有更多的持续性反应、更多的保存错误和更多的维持集失败(FMS),研究组间差异有统计学意义。注意缺陷多动障碍组在数字跨距、后向跨距和前向跨距上均明显低于对照组。P300振幅和潜伏期在两组间有显著差异。与对照组比较,CAEP各成分间ADHD延迟潜伏期均有统计学意义。CAEP各组分间P1-N1幅值差异有统计学意义,P2-N2幅值差异无统计学意义。两组ACPT差异有统计学意义,对照组ACPT比例较高。P300振幅与WCST(持之以恒误差)、P300振幅与ST结果、N2潜伏期与DS反向均呈正相关。结论评估ADHD儿童CAEPs和P300及其与神经认知测试(WCST、DS和ST)的相关性,对ADHD的诊断和治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信